CLARENCE BUCKLEY VS MS. PRISCILLA PITRE, RECORDS ANALYST, ALLEN CORRECTIONAL CENTER; RICHARD STALDER, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONS AND TERRY TERRELL, WARDEN, ALLEN CORRECTIONAL CENTER

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2006 CA 0130 CLARENCE BUCKLEY VERSUS JW MS PRISCILLA PITRE RECORDS ANALYST ALC RICHARD L STALDER SECRETARY DPS 1f C TERRY TERRELL WARDEN ALC Judgment Rendered Appealed from December 28 2006 the Nineteenth Judicial District Court In and for the Parish of East Baton Rouge Louisiana Trial Court Number 534 889 Honorable Curtis A Clarence Buckley Calloway Judge In Proper Person Kinder LA Plaintiff William L Kline Attorney for Baton Defendant Rouge LA Appellant Appellee Department of Public Safety Corrections State BEFORE KUHN GAIDRY AND WELCH JJ WELCH J Plaintiff Appellant inmate Clarence Buckley seeks review of the district court judgment dismissing Buckley failing to state accordance with the this case rules to report s a cause Case law the adopting screening recommendation of the Commissioner and claims without service of action or Department La R S 15 1178 D precedent and statutory authority clearly control and the issues raised involve recurring fact situations The adopted by the district no more August court in frivolous for as claim for which relief is available in cognizable screening requirements the on than disposition of application of well settled 2005 Commissioner 23 its an the September 13 2005 s Screening judgment thoroughly discusses the factual and procedural background and provides excellent an analysis of the applicable law supporting that decision Accordingly Rule 2 16 2A 2 Appeal All costs we 4 affirm the district 5 of this and appeal 6 are court s judgment in accordance with of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of assessed AFFIRMED 2 to the plaintiff appellant

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.