STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS KERRIAN JAVANA CLOFER DAVANA CLOFER TRIPPS

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 20-K-291 C/W 20-K-305 VERSUS FIFTH CIRCUIT KERRIAN JAVANA CLOFER DAVANA CLOFER TRIPPS COURT OF APPEAL C/W STATE OF LOUISIANA STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS DAVANA CLOFER TRIPPS KERRIAN JAVANA CLOFER May 04, 2021 Susan Buchholz First Deputy Clerk IN RE STATE OF LOUISIANA APPLYING FOR SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE FORTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST JOHN THE BAPTIST, STATE OF LOUISIANA, DIRECTED TO THE HONORABLE MADELINE JASMINE, DIVISION "A", NUMBER 15,274 Panel composed of Judges Susan M. Chehardy, Robert A. Chaisson, and Stephen J. Windhorst WRITS GRANTED, REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS Relator, the State of Louisiana, seeks this Court’s supervisory review of the trial court’s ruling that granted defendant Javana Tripps’ motion to sever her trial from that of her daughter, Kerrian Clofer, as well as the trial court’s rulings that denied the State’s motion in limine to designate evidence as res gestae, or in the alternative, notice of evidence under La. C.E. 404(B). The trial court granted defendant’s motion to sever before considering the State’s motion in limine, as seen by the fact that the trial court entered separate judgments on the State’s motion in limine—one for the charges against Davana Tripps (40th JDC No. 2015CR-274 (1)), and another for the charge against Kerrian Clofer (40th JDC No. 2015-CR-274 (2)). We consolidated the State’s two writ applications seeking review of these three judgments for consideration. As to the State’s motion in limine (20-K-305), although the State attached the evidence it purports to introduce at trial to its motion in limine, the transcript of the March 11, 2020 hearing reveals that the State failed to offer, file, and introduce into evidence the pertinent exhibits. While a full evidentiary hearing is not 20-K-291 C/W 20-K-305 mandated when determining the admissibility of other crimes evidence, see State v. Taylor, 16-1124, 16-1183 (La. 12/1/16), 217 So.3d 283, 292, we decline to review the propriety of the trial court’s ruling in this particular instance without the evidence properly entered into the record. Accordingly, we grant the State’s writ application in 20-K-305, vacate both of the trial court’s judgments entered on the State’s motion in limine, and remand to the trial court to conduct a new hearing. See State v. Pigott, 18-598 (La. App. 5 Cir. 1/24/19), 2019 WL 322837 (granting writ and remanding to reopen hearing for State to offer, file, and introduce into evidence the exhibits at issue on State’s notices of intent to use other crimes evidence and res gestae evidence); State v. Durning, 16-737 (La. App. 5 Cir. 1/17/17) (unpub.) (granting writ to allow State to properly offer, file, and introduce into evidence two consent judgments related to the State’s res gestae notice). As to defendant Tripps’ motion to sever (20-K-291), La. C.Cr.P. art. 704 provides: “Jointly indicted defendants shall be tried jointly unless: … (2) The court, on motion of the defendant, and after contradictory hearing with the district attorney, is satisfied that justice requires a severance.” Because the trial court’s determination as to the State’s motion in limine affects its decision as to whether justice requires severance under La. C.C.P. art. 704(2), we also grant the State’s writ application in 20-K-291, vacate the trial court’s judgment granting defendant Tripps’ motion to sever, and remand with instructions to conduct a new hearing subsequent to the trial court’s ruling on the State’s motion in limine. Gretna, Louisiana, this 4th day of May, 2021. SMC SJW 2 STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 20-K-291 C/W 20-K-305 VERSUS FIFTH CIRCUIT KERRIAN JAVANA CLOFER DAVANA CLOFER TRIPPS COURT OF APPEAL C/W STATE OF LOUISIANA STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS DAVANA CLOFER TRIPPS KERRIAN JAVANA CLOFER CHAISSON, J., DISSENTS IN PART. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the trial court’s ruling on the State’s “Motion in Limine to Designate Evidence as Res Gestae, or in the Alternative, Notice of Evidence under La. C.E. art. 404(B),” needs to be vacated and the matter remanded for a new hearing in order to afford the State the opportunity to properly introduce the evidence relating to its motion. Although the State did not formally introduce the exhibits in support of its motion in limine, it did submit the evidence, including police reports and certified copies of convictions from Calcasieu Parish, to the trial court. See State v. Taylor, 16-1124, 16-1183 (La. 12/1/16), 217 So.3d 283. Based on the evidence presented, the trial court denied the State’s motion in limine and issued judgments with reasons for its ruling as to each defendant, noting as to both that the probative value of the evidence was outweighed by its prejudicial effect. Absent an abuse of discretion, a trial court’s ruling on the admissibility of evidence pursuant to La. C.E. art. 404(B)(1) will not be disturbed. State. v. Carter, 15-99 (La. App. 5 Cir. 7/29/15), 171 So.3d 1265, 1280, writ denied, 15-1618 (La. 10/17/16), 207 So.3d 1068. In 20-K-291 C/W 20-K-305 the present case, I find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s ruling on the State’s motion in limine. RAC 2 SUSAN M. CHEHARDY CURTIS B. PURSELL CHIEF JUDGE CLERK OF COURT NANCY F. VEGA FREDERICKA H. WICKER CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK JUDE G. GRAVOIS MARC E. JOHNSON ROBERT A. CHAISSON SUSAN BUCHHOLZ STEPHEN J. WINDHORST HANS J. LILJEBERG JOHN J. MOLAISON, JR. JUDGES FIFTH CIRCUIT 101 DERBIGNY STREET (70053) POST OFFICE BOX 489 GRETNA, LOUISIANA 70054 www.fifthcircuit.org FIRST DEPUTY CLERK MELISSA C. LEDET DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL STAFF (504) 376-1400 (504) 376-1498 FAX NOTICE OF DISPOSITION CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE DISPOSITION IN THE FOREGOING MATTER HAS BEEN TRANSMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM RULES - COURT OF APPEAL, RULE 4-6 THIS DAY 05/04/2021 TO THE TRIAL JUDGE, THE TRIAL COURT CLERK OF COURT, AND AT LEAST ONE OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY, AND TO EACH PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL, AS LISTED BELOW: 20-K-291 C/W 20-K-305 E-NOTIFIED 40th District Court (Clerk) Honorable Madeline Jasmine (DISTRICT JUDGE) Honorable Vercell Fiffie (DISTRICT JUDGE) Lisa M. Parker (Respondent) Honorable Bridget A. Dinvaut (Relator) Nghana L. Gauff (Respondent) William R. Dieters (Relator) Justin B. LaCour (Relator) MAILED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.