TERRY GIBSON V. KUHN GIBSON & SON PLUMBING; ET AL.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IMPORTANT NOTICE
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED OPINION
THIS OPINION IS DESIGNATED "NOT TO BE PUBLISHED."
PURSUANT TO THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
PROMULGATED BY THE SUPREME COURT, CR 76 .28(4)(C),
THIS OPINION IS NOT TO BE PUBLISHED AND SHALL NOT BE
CITED OR USED AS BINDING PRECEDENT IN ANY OTHER
CASE IN ANY COURT OF THIS STATE ; HOWEVER,
UNPUBLISHED KENTUCKY APPELLATE DECISIONS,
RENDERED AFTER JANUARY 1, 2003, MAY BE CITED FOR
CONSIDERATION BY THE COURT IF THERE IS NO PUBLISHED
OPINION THAT WOULD ADEQUATELY ADDRESS THE ISSUE
BEFORE THE COURT. OPINIONS CITED FOR CONSIDERATION
BY THE COURT SHALL BE SET OUT AS AN UNPUBLISHED
DECISION IN THE FILED DOCUMENT AND A COPY OF THE
ENTIRE DECISION SHALL BE TENDERED ALONG WITH THE
DOCUMENT TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES TO THE
ACTION .
RENDERED : MARCH 18, 2010
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
,*ixyr:emr C~ourf of
2009-SC-000412-WC
I `J,
TERRY GIBSON
APPELLANT
ON APPEAL FROM COURT OF APPEALS
CASE NO . 2008-CA-001408-WC
WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD NO. 02-76774
KUHN GIBSON 8v SON PLUMBING ;
HONORABLE JAMES L. KERR,
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE; AND
WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD
APPELLEES
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT
AFFIRMING
The Workers' Compensation Board and the Court of Appeals affirmed an
Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ's) refusal to award temporary total disability
(TTD) benefits for periods before the date that the claimant filed his motion to
reopen . Appealing, the claimant asks the court to reconsider the precedent set
forth in Bartee v. University Medical Center' upon which the Board and the
Court of Appeals relied .
We affirm. KRS 342 .125(4) expressly prohibits "any change in the
amount of compensation" from being ordered before the date that the motion to
1 244 S.W.3d 91 (Ky. 2008).
reopen is filed. A post-award order requiring an employer to pay additional
TTD benefits changes the amount of compensation awarded .
The claimant, Terry Gibson, operates Kuhn Gibson and Son Plumbing,
his family's business . He sustained work-related injuries to his right foot in
2001 and 2002, after which an ALJ awarded past-due TTD benefits and
reasonable and necessary medical treatment for so long as he remained
disabled. The ALJ awarded interlocutory TTD benefits until such time as
Gibson reached maximum medical improvement (MMI) and deferred a decision
concerning permanent disability until that time.
On June 21, 2004, the ALJ awarded enhanced income benefits based on
findings that Gibson retained a 3% permanent impairment rating at MMI and
that he lacked the physical capacity to return to the type of work performed on
the date of injury. In rejecting Gibson's claim of permanent total disability, the
ALJ noted that his permanent restrictions were not very confining and that he
was a successful entrepreneur who had operated his business for some time.
Gibson appealed, but the Board affirmed the award.
Gibson worked on a limited basis for several months after receiving the
award. His treating physician, Dr. Shea, restricted him from performing any
type of work from October 22, 2004, through December 7, 2004, however, due
to swelling and other problems with his feet. Gibson resumed working limited
hours from December 8, 2004, until March 7, 2005, when Dr. Shea again
restricted him from performing any work.
On August 1, 2005, Gibson filed a motion to reopen in which he
contested Kuhn Gibson's refusal to pay his post-award medical expenses and
sought TTD benefits for the periods that Dr. Shea restricted him from working.
He supported the motion with his own affidavit, Dr. Shea's office notes, and
copies of numerous "off work" and "return to work" slips from Dr. Shea. The
motion was granted and the parties took further proof. Subsequent evidence
showed that Dr. Shea lifted the restriction and released Gibson to perform
limited work on September 26, 2005 .
The parties reached an agreement with respect to the disputed medical
expenses but submitted the TTD claim for a decision. The ALJ determined that
KRS 342 .125(4) prohibited a change in compensation before the date that
Gibson filed his motion to reopen . Noting that the definition of compensation
includes income benefits, the ALJ awarded TTD from August 1, 2005, through
September 26, 2005 .
KRS 342 .125(4) states, in pertinent part, as follows :
Upon reopening, the administrative law judge may
end, diminish, or increase compensation previously
awarded, within the maximum and minimum provided
in this chapter, or change or revoke a previous order .
The administrative law judge shall immediately send
all parties a copy of the subsequent order or award.
Reopening shall not affect the previous order or award
as to any sums already paid thereunder, and any
change in the amount of compensation shall be
ordered only from the date of filing the motion to
reopen. No employer shall suspend benefits during
pendency of any reopening procedures except upon
order of the administrative law judge. (emphasis
added) .
Bartee concerned a claim in which the worker underwent an elective
surgery despite her employer's refusal to authorize the procedure based on a
utilization review report. As a consequence, the employer filed a motion to
reopen to contest its liability for the expense. Ms. Bartee filed a subsequent
motion to reopen seeking TTD. She did so during the pendency of her
employer's reopening but after she returned to work.
The Bartee court determined that KRS 342 .125(4) prohibited the ALJ
from awarding TTD for a period that occurred before the date that the motion
to reopen was filed and that the employer's reopening did not raise an implicit
question concerning Ms. Bartee's entitlement to TTD. Addressing her public
policy arguments, the court noted that the surgery was not an emergency and
that nothing would have prevented her from filing a prospective motion,
supported with a treating physician's report, in which she sought to compel the
employer to authorize the surgery and pay related TTD.
Represented by the same attorney as Ms. Bartee, Gibson argues that
Bartee is based on the erroneous premise that awarding additional TTD at
reopening changes the amount of compensation previously awarded . He
reasons that TTD does not extend the 425-week period of permanent partial
disability benefits but merely suspends the award during the period of TTD .
What he fails to acknowledge is that the definition of compensation found in
KRS 342 .0011(14) includes income benefits and that TTD is an income benefit.
Thus, additional TTD awarded at reopening is a "change in the amount of
compensation" that the previous award ordered.
A motion to reopen seeking TTD need only be supported with a
reasonable prima facie showing that the worker will be able after further prooftaking to prove a change of disability as shown by objective medical evidence. 2
Thus, a motion supported with a well-crafted affidavit and a copy of a treating
physician's off-work slip or office note will generally suffice. Gibson complains
that Bartee fails to consider the "real world" difficulties of obtaining medical
reports, but nothing indicates that he encountered any delay or difficulty
obtaining off work slips from Dr. Shea. Although he complains that filing
prospective motions to reopen would produce needless litigation in situations
where an employer approves surgery, this case does not involve a post-award
surgery or hospitalization .
Finally, Gibson argues that a worker who undergoes post-award medical
treatment for the effects of an injury should not have to file a motion to reopen
to receive benefits for the duration of TTD when a treatment's compensability is
undisputed . He urges the court to view such a situation as a request for
interlocutory relief rather than as a motion to reopen. We decline to do so .
A worker's entitlement to medical treatment and TTD are separate
issues, decided under different standards. Compensable medical treatment
2 KRS 342 .125(1)(d) ; Stambaugh v. Cedar Creek Mining Co., 488 S.W.2d 397 (Ky.
1972).
may or may not produce a period of TTD. The term "interlocutory" refers to a
temporary decision, before the final decision on the merits . 3 Gibson filed a
claim, during the pendency of which he received an interlocutory TTD award.
When he reached MMI, he received an award that concluded the parties'
litigation and became final . The period of TTD at issue arose subsequently,
when no litigation between the parties was pending.
As the court noted in Bartee, workers' compensation is a statutory
creation. Although a final workers' compensation award may be enforced in
circuit court as a judgment,4 KRS 342 .125 permits a final award to be
reopened and modified under limited circumstances . KRS 342 .125(1)
designates a motion to reopen as the procedural device for invoking an ALJ's
authority to do so and sets forth permissible grounds for reopening, one of
which is a change of disability. KRS 342 .125(3) exempts a motion seeking TTD
from the 4-year period for reopening and permits such a motion to be filed
during the period of an award, which includes the period of future medical
benefits. We view KRS 342 .125(3) as an indication that the legislature
considered and decided the extent to which post-award TTD would be exempt
from the general reopening requirements . A decision to exempt TTD from the
limitation imposed by KRS 342 .125(4) is a matter for the legislature rather
than this court.
3 Black's Law Dictionary 819 (7th ed. 1999) .
KRS 342 .305 .
5 Radco Asbestos Specialists, Inc. v. Lyons, 295 S.W.3d 75 (Ky. 2009).
The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed .
All sitting. All concur.
COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT,
TERRY GIBSON:
Wayne C. Daub
600 West Main Street
Suite 300 - The 600 Building
Louisville, KY 40202
COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE,
KUHN GIBSON Sv SON PLUMBING :
Anthony K. Finaldi
John Edward Ballerstedt, Jr.
Ferreri 8s Fogle, PLLC
203 Speed Building
333 Guthrie Green
Louisville, KY 40202
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.