GREGORY A. GABBARD V. KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
,Suprnar Courf of ~irufurk
2007-SC-000459-KB
DATffE~qlo Z="~_I_z
GREGORY A. GABBARD
V.
MOVANT
IN SUPREME COURT
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION
RESPONDENT
OPINION AND ORDER
Upon motion of the Kentucky Bar Association (KBA), this Court entered
an order on January 21, 2010 directing Gregory A. Gabbard to show cause why
the conditional reinstatement allowed by this Court in August 2009 should not
be revoked due to several violations of the terms of his reinstatement.
Gabbard, whose KBA member number is 23955 and whose bar roster address
is 3165 Rosina Avenue, Covington, Kentucky 41015, was admitted to practice
in the Commonwealth of Kentucky on November 1, 1983 . In 2005, this Court
suspended Gabbard for a period of one year . Kentucky Bar Assn v. Gabbard,
172 S .W .3d 395 (Ky . 2005) . As noted, Gabbard gained conditional readmission
in August 2009. Gabbard v. Kentucky Bar Assn, 291 S.W.3d 221 (Ky. 2009) .
Although he filed a response to the show cause order, Gabbard has failed to
show cause why his reinstatement should not be revoked for non-compliance
with the established conditions. Accordingly, we grant the KBA's motion and
revoke Gabbard's conditional reinstatement .
In August 2009, this Court granted Gabbard's application for
reinstatement to the practice of law, conditioned upon his participation in the
KYLAP program, his continued compliance with the KYLAP monitoring and
supervision agreement, and payment of costs to the KBA in the amount of
1,415 .29 . Under the KYLAP agreement, Gabbard is subject to random drug
and alcohol screens and must be tested at least once every two months .
Gabbard's compliance report shows that he regularly fails to make required
calls into the testing system and, consequently, fails to take the required tests.
While he had called into the system 67 times, he had missed approximately SO
calls into the system. In June 2009, Gabbard was selected for a random drug
test and passed . Although he did not call in and was not selected for a random
test in July 2009, he submitted for a test, and the results were positive for
opiates, codeine, and morphine . Since his order of reinstatement, Gabbard has
failed to appear for six required random drug tests. In his response to the
show cause order, Gabbard explains that his positive drug test was the result
of prescription cough medicine containing codeine. He attached records
verifying that a diagnosis of pneumonia precipitated a prescription for this
medication . However, Gabbard does not dispute the KBA's allegations
concerning his failure to call in or submit to random drug tests .
Additionally, the KYLAP agreement requires Gabbard to attend meetings
of Alcoholics Anonymous or another approved recovery program at least twice
per week. Although Gabbard agreed to keep a log of his attendance, he did not
provide it upon request of his KYLAP Director. In his response, Gabbard
contends that he attends AA meetings regularly and, in fact, exceeds the
frequency required by his KYLAP agreement. And although Gabbard does
attach his log record to his response, he admits that his log is woefully
inadequate .
Gabbard's KYLAP agreement also requires him to contact his monitor at
least bi-monthly, and every week if the monitor so requests. A quarterly report,
dated August 3, 2009, revealed that Gabbard had not contacted his monitor by
telephone for three months and that the two had only had one face-to-face
contact during that period. A subsequent quarterly report indicated that his
monitor "had not heard from Greg in 3 months," and that his progress in the
recovery program was "unknown." Gabbard admits his failure to report to his
KYLAP monitor .
Gabbard also admits that he has yet to pay costs to the KBA as required
by the order of conditional reinstatement. He further admits that he owes
additional costs in the amount of $1,688.77, certified to the Court by the KBA
Character and Fitness Committee, for payment of an investigator. However,
Gabbard asserts that he has been unable to pay these costs due to dismal
financial circumstances.
Based on the foregoing, the KBA recommends that Gabbard's conditional
reinstatement be revoked . In his response, Gabbard set out in detail several
unfortunate circumstances, including his own ill health as well as that of his
wife, costly surgeries, and loss of employment and loss of health insurance,
which contributed to his non-compliance with the conditions of his
reinstatement. He, therefore, requests that the Court extend the Show Cause
Order for a period of three months to allow him to demonstrate compliance
with the Court's orders .
While we acknowledge Gabbard's personal difficulties and commend his
history of public service and pro bono work as well as his efforts to support
children and grandchildren in need, his non-compliance with the conditions of
his reinstatement is simply too substantial to excuse .
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1 . Gregory A. Gabbard's reinstatement to the practice of law on August
27, 2009 is revoked and he is suspended from the practice of law in this
Commonwealth until reinstated as provided by SCR 3 .510 .
2 . In accord with SCR 3 .390, if he has not already done so, Gabbard is
directed to notify in writing all clients and all courts in which he has matters
pending of his inability to practice law, within ten days from the date of entry of
this Opinion and Order. Gabbard is further directed to furnish copies of said
letters of notice to the Director of the Kentucky Bar Association. Further,
Gabbard shall without delay, to the extent reasonably possible, cancel and
cease any advertising activities in which he is engaged.
3 . Gabbard is ordered to pay costs to the KBA in the amount of
$1,415.29 in accord with this Court's August 27, 2009 order.
4. Gabbard is ordered to pay costs of $1,688 .75 to the Character and
Fitness Committee in accord with this Court's order of November 10, 2009 .
All sitting. All concur.
ENTERED : April 22, 2010
CHIEF JUSTICE
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
