KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION V. BRIAN SCOTT CONLEY
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TO BE PUBLISHED
,Suprmv Caurf . of
2006-SC-000530-KB
0L
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION
V.
AT
MOVANT
IN SUPREME COURT
BRIAN SCOTT CONLEY
RESPONDENT
OPINION AND ORDER
Brian Scott Conley, whose bar roster address is 125 Penmoken Park, Lexington,
Kentucky 40503, was charged with a total of six counts of professional misconduct .
The violations stem from Conley's representation of two clients on criminal matters .
Conley admitted the allegations contained in the charges, and the Kentucky Bar
Association and Conley reached an agreement regarding his discipline, which the
Board of Governors (the Board) approves and recommends that this Court impose .
Conley's KBA Member Number is 85660, and his date of admission to the KBA
is May 1, 1995 .
The KBA opened two files on Conley, KBA File No. 10743 and File No. 11142.
As agreed by the parties, the underlying facts and charges are as follows :
I. Facts and Charges
a. KBA File No. 10743
Conley failed to appear for two scheduled court hearings on behalf of a client in
Scott District Court . The court issued a summons directing Conley to appear on June
24, 2003, to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court for his failure
to appear on the scheduled court dates . Conley did not appear for the show cause
hearing because he was involved in an automobile accident . Conley maintains that he
called the Scott Circuit Court Clerk to inform the judge that he would not be there, but
the judge states that the message she received from the clerk was that Conley would
be late for court.
The judge held Conley in contempt of court and sentenced him to two days in jail
and imposed a fine of $500 .00 . The judge probated the jail sentence on the condition
that Conley contact the Kentucky Lawyer's Assistance Program (KYLAP) coordinator
within seven days . And the judge relieved Conley from paying the fine on the condition
that he participate in KYLAP for a period of 90 days . Conley agreed to contact the
KYLAP coordinator and participate in KYLAP. However, as of the date of submission to
the Board, the KYLAP director reported that Conley had not made a serious effort to
seek assistance for his problems.
Due to his conduct, the Inquiry Commission charged him with violating SCR
3.130-1 .3 by failing to appear on behalf of his client at scheduled court meetings and
SCR 3.130-3.4(c) by knowingly and intentionally failing to appear in the Scott District
Court on three separate occasions.
b. KBA File No. 11142
Conley represented Cecil Johnson in Fayette Circuit Court in the case of
Commonwealth v. Cecil Johnson , Case No. 02-CR-00063 . In this case, Conley failed
to appear on the scheduled trial date of October 13, 2003. Johnson appeared in court
on that date and informed the judge that he had spoken to Conley about the case four
days earlier, and he had no indication that Conley was not going to appear for the trial .
The judge scheduled the case for a status conference on October 17, 2003, for which
Conley also failed to appear. The judge appointed Legal Aid to represent Johnson
because he stated that he had expended all of his money to retain Conley .
The presiding Fayette Circuit Court judge filed a bar complaint.
Due to his conduct, the Inquiry Commission charged him with violating : SCR
3.130-1 .3 by failing to appear on behalf of his client at scheduled court meetings; SCR
3.130-1 .16(d) by abruptly terminating his representation when he did not appear for the
trial and status conference and without prior notification to his client ; SCR 3.130-1 .5(a)
by accepting a fee then failing to appear for scheduled court dates ; and SCR 3.1308 .1 (b) by failing to file a response to the bar complaint .
Although Conley has admitted to the four charges related to his representation of
Johnson, he states that he returned the fee he charged Johnson shortly after he missed
the court appearance .
11. The Decision and Recommendation of the Board on Discipline
In KBA File No . 10743, the Board found Conley guilty by a vote of 14-0 of
violating SCR 3.130-1 .3 and SCR 3.130-3.4(c) . In KBA File No . 11142, the Board
found Conley guilty by a vote of 14-0 of violating SCR 3.130-1 .3, SCR 3 .130-1 .16(d),
SCR 3.130-1 .5(a), and SCR 3.130-8.1(b).
The Board concluded that the appropriate discipline would be as the parties
agreed : a 60-day suspension, probated for a period of two years subject to a number
of conditions.
111. Discipline
Conley's prior discipline consists of suspension for continuing legal education
non-compliance effective January 12, 2005 . The discipline we impose by this Order will
run concurrently with this suspension .
Based on the facts and recommendation of the Board, we adopt the Board's
decision regarding the appropriate discipline for Conley's violations of SCR 3.130-1 .3
(two counts), SCR 3.130-3 .4(c), SCR 3.130-1 .16(d), SCR 3.130-1 .5(a), and SCR 3 .130
8.1 (b) and order Conley suspended for 60 days, probated for two years subject to the
conditions specified below.
Thus, it is ORDERED that:
1 . Brian Scott Conley be suspended from the practice of law for 60 days,
probated for two years subject to the following conditions:
(a) He shall adhere to the provisions of a KYLAP supervision agreement to
address issues of drug use, which agreement Conley signed on May 19, 2006, the day
of the Board meeting;
(b) He shall not commit any crimes, including misdemeanors and felonies ;
(c) He shall sign authorizations allowing the KBA to review his records held by
KYLAP, mental health professionals, social workers, and any and all medical records
and mental health records;
(d) The Director of KYLAP will file quarterly reports with the Disciplinary Clerk of
the KBA for distribution to the Office of Bar- Counsel . These reports shall state whether
he is complying with the terms and conditions of this Order;
(e) If at any time the KYLAP Director becomes aware of Conley's violations of
any of the terms of the supervision agreement or this Order, he shall immediately file a
notice of such violations with the Disciplinary Clerk of the KBA for distribution to the
Office of Bar Counsel and Conley ;
(f) He shall pay all costs for the testing required by the supervision agreement ;
(g) He shall timely pay his KBA membership dues; and
(h) He shall timely satisfy all continuing legal education requirements ; and
2 . Conley shall pay the costs of $363.34 for which execution may issue from this
Court upon finality of the Opinion and Order.
All concur.
Entered : October 19, 2006.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
