KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION V. ARTHUR WOODSON PULLIAM
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TO BE PUBLISHED
,*1IyrE1ttE
~vurf of
2006-SC-000128-KB
(KBA FILE NO . 10825)
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION
V.
A
IN SUPREME COURT
ARTHUR WOODSON PULLIAM
KBA MEMBER # 85456
APPELLEE
OPINION AND ORDER
Respondent, Arthur Woodson Pulliam, KBA Member # 85456, was
admitted to the practice of law in Kentucky on October 21, 1994. He was
previously suspended from the practice of law on April 21, 2005, for a period of
61 days. Mr. Pulliam's bar roster and last known address is 300 Main Street,
P .O. Box 159, Munfordville, Kentucky 42765 .
On July 10, 2003, Pulliam was arrested and charged with the following
offenses :
1 . Possession of controlled substance in the third degree (KRS 218A.1417) ;
2. Possession of controlled substances not in original container (KRS
218A.210) ;
3. Possession of drug paraphernalia (KRS 218A.500(2));
4. Attempted possession of controlled substance in the first degree (KRS
218A.1415) ;
5. Possession of marijuana (KRS 218A.1422) ; and,
6. DUI second offense (KRS 189A.010) .
i
On July 31, 2003, Pulliam pled guilty to the charge of possession of marijuana
and to the charge of attempted first degree possession of a controlled substance.
KBA File Number 10825
On April 9, 2004, the Inquiry Commission charged that Pulliam had
engaged in professional misconduct in violation of SCR 3.130(8 .3) by committing
a criminal act that reflects adversely on the Respondent's honesty,
trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects . The Disciplinary Clerk
appointed Hon. Thomas H. Burnett of Lexington, Kentucky, to serve as Trial
Commissioner, which was approved by Chief Justice Joseph Lambert pursuant
to SCR 3.230 .
On September 9, 2004, an Amended Charge was issued by the Inquiry
Commission to correct some of the information relating to Respondent's guilty
plea ; however, no additional counts were added. The Amended Charge further
charged the Respondent with violating SCR 3.130(8 .3) because he had also
attempted to possess a controlled substance, which had been inadvertently
omitted in the original Charge.' Respondent Pulliam admitted in his first Answer
that he had possessed marijuana and that he had pled guilty to possession of
marijuana. In his Answer to the Amended Charge, Respondent Pulliam again
admitted to pleading guilty to possession of marijuana and to attempted
possession of a controlled substance .
The Trial Commissioner held an evidentiary hearing on July 27, 2005, in
which Respondent did not appear in person or by counsel . Respondent was
aware of the disciplinary proceeding against him and had previously submitted
' Respondent Pulliam also pled guilty to this charge in his plea on July 31, 2003.
-2-
answers to the related charges, as well as participated in pre-trial telephonic
conferences with the Trial Commissioner and the Office of Bar Counsel. The
Order setting the evidentiary hearing was mailed to Respondent at his bar roster
and last known address by the Disciplinary Clerk on June 17, 2005; however, it
was not returned .
The Trial Commissioner found Respondent guilty of violating SCR
3.130(8 .3) by committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on Respondent's
honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects . The Trial
Commissioner subsequently recommended the Respondent receive a
suspension for one hundred and eighty-one (181) days for the violation of SCR
3.130(8 .3). The KBA filed a Notice of Appeal pursuant to SCR 3.365 on October
21, 2005, in order for the Board to review the Trial Commissioner's
recommendation .
Factual Backaround
Initially, Respondent was asked to provide an explanation regarding his
arrest and criminal charges by letter dated August 20, 2003 . In response,
Respondent admitted pleading guilty to possession of marijuana and that he is a
recovering alcoholic . Further, in both his initial Answer and his Answer to the
Amended Charge, Respondent asserts that he has been diagnosed with several
disorders, each of which "bear a contribution to [his] actions." Although
Respondent admits his conduct was not appropriate, he does not believe that it
calls into question his fitness as a lawyer.
The Inquiry Commission issued an Inquiry Commission Complaint on
December 8, 2003. Respondent informed the Inquiry Commission that he had
abstained from the use of alcohol and drugs since July 2003, and that he was
voluntarily enrolled in the KBA Kentucky Lawyers' Assistance Program
("KYLAP") as a self-referral .
During the evidentiary hearing held by the Trial Commissioner on July 27,
2005, KYLAP Director C. Houston "Hoot" Ebert testified regarding Respondent's
past participation in KYLAP, and he provided a copy of a signed waiver allowing
him to discuss the details of Respondent's participation . Director Ebert explained
that Respondent originally became involved with the Lawyers Helping Lawyers
program in 2002 in compliance with an Order of this Court as the program was
then changing over to the new KYLAP. Respondent Pulliam signed a
supervision agreement with KYLAP on July 23, 2003 ; however, according to
Director Ebert, Respondent "is not actively participating with KYLAP" and no one
with KYLAP is sure of his whereabouts . In March 2005, Respondent stopped
calling his monitor and has not responded to any phone calls or correspondence
according to Director Ebert.
Moreover, in August 2004, Respondent was arrested for another alcoholrelated offense, which violated the terms of his two-year probation . This Court
revoked his probation and imposed the 61-day suspension in April 2005 as
previously mentioned .
Findinas and Conclusions of Board of Governors
As mentioned, the Trial Commissioner recommended a 181-day
suspension based on the evidence presented. Complainant, Kentucky Bar
Association, filed a Brief with the Board of Governors ; Respondent, however, has
2 The facts surrounding the prior probation were not made available.
-4-
filed no further brief in this matter. The Board subsequently adopted the findings
of fact of the Trial Commissioner . Furthermore, the Board agreed with the Trial
Commissioner's recommendation that Respondent has violated SCR 3 .130(8 .3)
and rejected the defense raised in Respondent's verified Answers .
Regarding discipline, the Board, noting the Trial Commissioner's findings
with regard to Respondent's past offenses and prior discipline, concluded that
Respondent should be suspended for 181 days for his conduct in this matter.
The Board voted not to review this case de novo. A vote was taken as to
whether the recommendation of the Trial Commissioner as the finding of a
violation and the degree of discipline imposed was supported by substantial
evidence. The result of the Board's vote was 20-0 that the Trial Commissioner's
findings were based on substantial evidence . The Board has recommended to
this Court that Respondent be found guilty of the charge in KBA File No. 10825
and recommends that Respondent be suspended from the practice of law for 181
days.
After careful consideration of the relevant facts and the KBA's
recommendations, this Court orders that Mr. Pulliam be suspended from the
practice of law for 181 days . THUS, IT IS ORDERED :
1 .) That Respondent, Arthur Woodson Pulliam, be suspended from the
practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky for 181 days, effective
immediately upon entry of this order . This suspension shall continue until
Respondent is reinstated to the practice of law by Order of this Court
pursuant to SCR 3.510.
2 .) Pursuant to SCR 3 .390, Respondent shall provide notice to any clients he
currently represents of his inability to provide further legal services, shall
notify all courts in which he has matters pending of his suspension, and
shall provide the Director of the Kentucky Bar Association with a copy of
all such letters simultaneously with their mailing.
3 .) That Respondent shall pay the certification of costs in the amount of
$647.41 for which execution may issue from this Court upon finality of the
Opinion and Order.
All concur.
ENTERED : May
2006
COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT :
Bruce K. Davis
Executive Director
Kentucky Bar Association
514 West Main Street
Frankfort, KY 40601
Steven T. Pulliam
Kentucky Bar Association
514 West Main Street
Frankfort, KY 40601
COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE:
Arthur Woodson Pulliam
P.O. Box 159
Munfordville, KY 42765
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
