KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, CLE COMMISSION V. PAUL STEPHEN WHITE
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TO BE PUBLISHED
,Sixyrrntr~ ~ourf of `-enfixrh
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION,
CLE COMMISSION
V.
MOVANT
IN SUPREME COURT
PAUL STEPHEN WHITE
RESPONDENT
OPINION AND ORDER
On November 19, 2002, this Court issued an Order directing Respondent,
Paul Stephen White, to show cause why he should not be suspended from the practice
of law pursuant to SCR 3 .669(4) for failure to comply with SCR 3.661 Continuing Legal
Education requirements for the 2001-2002 educational year. Respondent was deficient
11 .25 general credits, and this included 0.75 ethics credits .
In response to the Order, Respondent stated that he has been
"recuperating from severe depression ." He explained, "A significant part of my problem
involved an inability to work in confrontational situations." To deal with his problem, he
has limited his legal practice to non-trial matters such as "several title opinions and
drafting a few wills ." He also stated that in an effort to increase his daily physical
activity and to make up for lost income, he has started working with an electrical
contractor. Respondent acknowledged that he did not view these circumstances as an
excuse for his CLE deficiency, but hopes that they may offer an explanation to mitigate
the sanction . Respondent reported that he attended the November 19-20, 2002, KBA
Update in Lexington, earning 13 .75 hours (including 4.25 hours of ethics), satisfying the
deficiency. He also reported that he was scheduled to attend a CLE event offered in
December 2002 at which he planned to earn another 10.25 hours (including one hour of
ethics).
In reply, the KBA CLE Commission stated its belief that Respondent has
not shown adequate cause yet recommends lesser sanctions in lieu of suspension . In
support of its request, the Commission points out that Respondent was sent three
written notices regarding the deficiency (April 12, July 18, and August 21, 2002), and
that these notices were sent prior to the September 10 deadline for filing a request for a
time extension pursuant to SCR 3 .667. The Commission further stated that
Respondent failed to file a time extension request pursuant to SCR 3 .667, that he failed
to provide supporting documentation of his depression, and that he failed to apply for a
hardship extension or exemption under SCR 3.667 and SCR 3 .666. The Commission
revealed and the record reflects that Respondent, as of December 20, 2002, had
certified completion of 24.00 general credits, including 5.25 ethics credits, for the 20022003 educational year. Thus, more than a sufficient number of hours were obtained to
cure the deficiency within five months of the end of the educational year. He has also
obtained a substantial number of credits for the current year.
While Respondent clearly violated the CLE requirements, and his
personal difficulties provide no excuse for failing to discharge his responsibilities as a
lawyer, we believe sufficient cause has been shown to mitigate punishment.
Respondent described a condition of depression, and, while he failed to offer
supporting documents, his behavior is not inconsistent with such a condition . Likewise,
his remedial efforts are consistent with a recognition of responsibility. We further note
that Respondent has no prior history of CLE deficiency and no other disciplinary
proceedings appear in the record .
The Commission seeks imposition of a $750 fine, procurement of a nonpractice exemption from CLE requirements that would necessitate cessation of
practice, and contact with the Lawyers Assistance Program . We believe the
punishment sought is too harsh . Instead, we believe Respondent should be required to
pay a lesser fine and that he be required to initiate contact with the Lawyers Assistance
Program. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
1 . Respondent, Paul Stephen White, shall pay a fine of $250 for noncompliance with SCR 3.661(1), payable to the Kentucky Bar Association within twenty
(20) days from the date of this Order;
2 . Respondent's CLE deficiency shall be cured by the CLE credits earned
during the 2002-2003 educational year ;
3 . Respondent shall not be eligible for a non-hardship extension under
SCR 3.667(2) for the educational years ending June 30; 2003, and June 30, 2004.
4. Respondent shall contact the Lawyers Assistant Program at the
Kentucky Bar Center within twenty (20) days from entry of this Order .
Lambert, C .J ., and Graves, Keller, Stumbo, and Wintersheimer, JJ.,
concur. Cooper and Johnstone, JJ., dissent and would assess the $750 fine
recommended by the CLE Commission .
ENTERED : March 20, 2003.
COUNSEL FOR MOVANT :
Bruce K. Davis, Executive Director
Janis E. Clark
Bar Counsel
Kentucky Bar Association
514 West Main Street
Frankfort, KY 40601
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT :
Paul Stephen White
407 East Main Street
Danville, KY 40422
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
