ELBERT PHILLIP LONG v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
RENDERED: JUNE 17, 2022; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2021-CA-0977-MR ELBERT PHILLIP LONG v. APPELLANT APPEAL FROM DAVIESS CIRCUIT COURT HONORABLE LISA P. JONES, JUDGE ACTION NO. 76-CR-18196 COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY APPELLEE OPINION REVERSING AND REMANDING ** ** ** ** ** BEFORE: DIXON, JONES, AND K. THOMPSON, JUDGES. DIXON, JUDGE: Elbert Phillip Long appeals the order denying his pro se motion to amend his sentence pursuant to CR1 60.02 and 60.03, entered July 23, 2021, by the Daviess Circuit Court. After careful review of the briefs, record, and law, we reverse and remand. 1 Kentucky Rules of Civil Procedure. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND In 1977, Long was convicted of murder and attempted rape and was sentenced, respectively, to life imprisonment and five years to run consecutively. His convictions were affirmed on direct appeal. Long v. Commonwealth, 559 S.W.2d 482 (Ky. 1977). Thereafter, Long filed a multitude of collateral challenges regarding his convictions and sentences, as well as state and federal civil actions pertaining to the conditions of his confinement. In June 2021, Long again sought to vacate, amend, or correct his sentence pursuant to CR 60.02 and 60.03, renewing his claim that his sentence was illegal. Determining that Long’s motion was successive and procedurally barred, the court denied relief, and this appeal followed. ANALYSIS Long raises various claims on appeal2; however, we need only address his contention that his consecutive sentences of life imprisonment and five years are illegal and subject to correction at any time. “A sentence that lies outside the statutory limits is an illegal sentence[.]” McClanahan v. Commonwealth, 308 S.W.3d 694, 701 (Ky. 2010). Long also challenges the court’s failure to certify the record in accordance with his designation, which is moot given our ruling, and the manner in which the Department of Corrections treats his sentences for purposes of classification, which is not properly before this Court (see Mason v. Commonwealth, 331 S.W.3d 610, 629 (Ky. 2011)). 2 -2- Illegal sentences are considered void only to the extent they exceed statutory limits and are always subject to correction. Phon v. Commonwealth, 545 S.W.3d 284, 304-07 (Ky. 2018). KRS3 532.110 and KRS 532.080 provide that life imprisonment is the longest permissible sentence which may be imposed, and consequently, it is settled law that a court exceeds this limitation when additional sentences arising from the same judgment are ordered to be served consecutively to a life sentence. Goben v. Commonwealth, 503 S.W.3d 890, 923 (Ky. 2016); Bedell v. Commonwealth, 870 S.W.2d 779, 783 (Ky. 1993)4; Shannon v. Commonwealth, 562 S.W.2d 301, 303 (Ky. 1978), overruled on other grounds by Wellman v. Commonwealth, 694 S.W.2d 696 (Ky. 1985). As Kentucky appellate courts have twice acknowledged, Long’s sentence to life imprisonment plus five years exceeds the statutory limit established by KRS 532.110 and KRS 532.080; thus, the sentence is illegal.5 The cursory record on appeal demonstrates that this erroneous judgment has never been 3 Kentucky Revised Statutes. 4 Overruling Rackley v. Commonwealth, 674 S.W.2d 512 (Ky. 1984), which recognized a distinction in capital cases. 5 In Long v. Sapp, No. 1999-CA-002185-MR, at 2, (Ky. App. Oct. 20, 2000), the Court noted in passing that, “[a]though the original judgment stated the sentences were to be served consecutively, they are now treated as concurrent sentences[,]” citing in support Bedell, supra, and See v. Commonwealth, 746 S.W.2d 401 (Ky. 1988). Additionally, as cited by the Commonwealth, in Long v. White, No. 2018-CA-001485-MR, 2019 WL 1092656, at *1 (Ky. App. Mar. 8, 2019), the Court stated that a review of Long’s prior litigation “indicate[s] that [he] was correct that his sentence of life plus five years was unlawful, but his sentence has long since been corrected to life imprisonment.” -3- corrected. Accordingly, we must reverse and remand for entry of an amended sentence. On remand, the court shall resentence Long to life on the murder charge and five years on the attempted rape charge to run concurrently. CONCLUSION Therefore, and for the forgoing reasons, the order of the Daviess Circuit Court is REVERSED, and this matter is REMANDED for entry of an amended judgment in conformance with this Opinion. ALL CONCUR. BRIEFS FOR APPELLANT: BRIEF FOR APPELLEE: Elbert Phillip Long, pro se LaGrange, Kentucky Daniel Cameron Attorney General of Kentucky Todd D. Ferguson Assistant Attorney General Frankfort, Kentucky -4-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
