J.M. APPEALS v. R.V.; J.V.; INFANT GIRL, J.M.V., A CHILD, AKA J.M.V.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
RENDERED:
DECEMBER 9, 2005; 10:00 A.M.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
Commonwealth Of Kentucky
Court of Appeals
NO. 2005-CA-000103-ME
AND
NO. 2005-CA-000227-ME
J.M.
APPELLANT
APPEALS FROM FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT
HONORABLE TIMOTHY NEIL PHILPOT, JUDGE
ACTION NO. 03-AD-00176
v.
R.V.; J.V.; INFANT GIRL,
J.M.V., A CHILD, AKA J.M.V.
APPELLEES
OPINION
AFFIRMING
** ** ** ** **
BEFORE:
KNOPF, JOHNSON AND VANMETER, JUDGES.
KNOPF, JUDGE:
J.M. brings these consolidated appeals from an
order of the Fayette Circuit Court terminating her parental
rights and granting the petition of R.V. and J.V. to adopt her
child.
We find that J.M. is estopped from raising any claim of
error on appeal based upon her agreement with R.V. and J.V. and
her sworn testimony consenting to the termination of parental
rights and to the adoption.
Hence, we affirm.
On December 12, 2003, J.M. gave birth to a daughter,
now known as J.M.V.
Prior to the birth, J.M. had agreed that
R.V. and J.V. would adopt the child.
R.V. and J.V. filed a
petition for adoption on December 15, and the trial court entered
a temporary order granting them custody of the child.
On
December 18, J.M. executed a notarized document voluntarily
surrendering her parental rights and giving consent to the
adoption of J.M.V. by R.V. and J.V.
However, on January 15,
2004, J.M. sent a written notification to R.V. and J.V.
withdrawing her consent.
Thereafter, in May 2004, J.M. filed a motion seeking to
set aside R.V. and J.V.’s adoption petition and seeking custody
of J.M.V.
2004.
The matter then proceeded to trial in December of
On the third day of trial, December 16, the parties
announced that they had reached a settlement agreement.
J.M.
testified, under oath, that she had agreed to rescind her
revocation of consent and to a voluntary termination of her
parental rights.
J.M. further testified that she agreed to waive
her right to appeal.
The settlement agreement was also read into
the record and J.M. informed the court that she had agreed to and
was satisfied with its terms.
Based on this agreement, the trial court entered an
order on December 17 terminating J.M.’s parental rights and
granting R.V. and J.V.’s petition to adopt J.M.V.
The trial
court separately entered findings of fact and conclusions of law
-2-
the same date. 1
Notwithstanding the settlement agreement, J.M.
appealed from the judgment. 2
J.M. contends that her oral rescission of her
revocation of consent failed to meet the writing requirements of
KRS 199.500(1) and KRS 199.011(14).
But contrary to J.M.’s
assertion, this is not a case involving unpreserved or palpable
error.
Rather, J.M. specifically agreed, on the record and under
oath, that she was waiving her right to appeal from the trial
court’s order terminating her parental rights.
J.M. presents no
grounds for setting aside that agreement.
Furthermore, J.M. presents no authority for the
proposition that the trial court’s failure to obtain her consent
to the termination in writing renders her consent void.
In fact,
J.M. had already executed her consent to termination of parental
rights on December 18, 2003.
Her testimony in court merely
rescinded her January 15, 2004 revocation of consent, and
reinstated her prior written consent.
While it might have been
better practice to have J.M. execute a new written consent, her
1
On January 4, 2005, the trial court entered “Amended
Supplemental Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law” to correct
several typographical errors in its December 17 findings.
2
J.M. filed separate notices of appeal from the December 17,
2004, findings and judgment, and from the January 4, 2005, order
entering amended supplemental findings. These appeals were
ordered consolidated by the motion panel.
-3-
consent is fully documented in the record.
Consequently, J.M. is
estopped from raising any claim of error on appeal. 3
Accordingly, the order and judgment of adoption entered
by the Fayette Circuit Court on December 17, 2004, is affirmed.
ALL CONCUR.
BRIEF FOR APPELLANT:
BRIEF FOR APPELLEE:
Jacqueline K. Schroering
C. Timothy White
Louisville, Kentucky
Valerie S. Kershaw
Sandra Mendez Dawahare
Dawahare & Kershaw, LLP
Lexington, Kentucky
GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR
J.M.V., A/K/A INFANT GIRL
J.M.V.
Duane F. Osborne
Lexington, Kentucky
3
See Calloway v. Calloway, 707 S.W.2d 789 (Ky.App. 1986),
holding that a property settlement agreement dictated into the
record and agreed to by the parties in open court meets the
writing requirement of KRS 403.180.
-4-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.