State of Iowa v. Deirdre Laine Witham
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 18-1548 Filed December 18, 2019 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. DEIRDRE LAINE WITHAM, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cerro Gordo County, Adam D. Sauer, District Associate Judge. Deirdre Laine Witham appeals her sentence following a guilty plea to operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, third offense. JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED. Denise M. Gonyea of McKelvie Law Office, Grinnell, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Linda J. Hines, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Potterfield and Mullins, JJ. 2 VAITHESWARAN, Presiding Judge. Deirdre Laine Witham pled guilty to operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, third offense, and the district court imposed judgment and sentence. See Iowa Code § 321J.2 (2018). The sentencing order stated Witham had “the reasonable ability to pay” certain financial obligations, including “court costs.” On appeal, Witham contends “the total amount of restitution was not presented to the court at the time of sentencing,” rendering “the plan of restitution . . . legally deficient.” See State v. Albright, 925 N.W.2d 144, 162 (Iowa 2019) (“Courts must wait to enter a final order of restitution until all items of restitution are before the court. Once the court has all the items of restitution before it, then and only then shall the court make an assessment as to the offender’s reasonable ability to pay.”). The State responds that we should consider dismissing the appeal. Alternatively, the State agrees “the district court erred in determining Witham’s reasonable ability to pay prior to ‘knowing the amount of each item of restitution,’” citing Albright, 925 N.W.2d at 162. Based on Albright, “we vacate the restitution part of the sentencing order and remand the case to the district court to order restitution in a manner consistent with” Albright. See id. at 162–63. JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
