STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. CORDARREL DONTYA SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 14-0812 Filed January 13, 2016 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. CORDARREL DONTYA SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, Bradley J. Harris, Judge. The defendant appeals from the district court’s denial of his motions to dismiss for violation of the speedy indictment rule. REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS. Zorana Wortham-White of Wortham-White Law Office, Waterloo, for appellant Smith. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Alexandra Link, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Considered by Danilson, C.J., and Vogel and Tabor, JJ. 2 DANILSON, Chief Judge. Our original opinion in this case was vacated when we granted Smith’s petition for rehearing. See Iowa R. App. P. 6.1204(5). Smith’s case is a companion case to State v. Washington, No. 14-0792, 2015 WL ___ (Iowa Ct. App. Nov. 25, 2015). Smith, as his co-defendant Washington did, appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss, claiming the State violated the speedy indictment rule. After the State filed a second trial information on May 22, 2014, both Smith and Washington again filed motions to dismiss on the same grounds, and the motions were denied. But only Smith filed a second application for discretionary review. Our supreme court granted both of Smith’s applications, consolidated the appeals, and transferred them to us. For the same reasons enumerated in Washington, Smith was arrested for speedy indictment purposes on June 10, 2012, and any trial informations filed more than forty-five days after that date were untimely. See Iowa R. Crim. P. 2.33(2)(a). Accordingly, we find the district court erred in denying Smith’s motions to dismiss. We reverse the district court’s rulings and remand for entry of dismissal of the charges REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
