IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF SEAN M. FROST AND NAOMI S. FROST, n/k/a NAOMI S. DORAN Upon the Petition of SEAN M. FROST, Petitioner-Appellant, And Concerning NAOMI S. FROST, n/k/a NAOMI S. DORAN, Respondent-Appellee.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 3-276 / 12-2030 Filed April 24, 2013 IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF SEAN M. FROST AND NAOMI S. FROST, n/k/a NAOMI S. DORAN Upon the Petition of SEAN M. FROST, Petitioner-Appellant, And Concerning NAOMI S. FROST, n/k/a NAOMI S. DORAN, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Marshall County, Michael J. Moon, Judge. Sean Frost appeals the district court s order modifying the physical care provisions of the parties dissolution decree. AFFIRMED. Barry S. Kaplan and Melissa A. Nine of Kaplan, Frese & Nine, L.L.P., Marshalltown, for appellant. Laura A. Sopher of Grimes, Buck, Schoell, Beach & Hitchins, Marshalltown, for appellee. Considered by Vogel, P.J., and Potterfield and Doyle, JJ. 2 DOYLE, J. Sean Frost appeals the district court s order modifying the physical care provisions of the parties dissolution decree, raising a plethora of complaints in regard to the district court s decision to discontinue the parties joint physical care arrangement and place their two children in the physical care of their mother rather than with him. Upon our de novo review, we are in agreement with the district court that [t]he parents are not able to communicate about anything and [t]he evidence has clearly demonstrated that a change of physical care of the children is mandated in this case. See In re Marriage of Malloy, 687 N.W.2d 110, 113 (Iowa Ct. App. 2004) (setting forth standard for modification). Although we in no way condone the actions of either party that have effectuated and maintained the controversy between them (which unfortunately has involved the children at times), we find Naomi Doran has shown the ability to render better parenting. See Melchiori v. Kooi, 644 N.W.2d 365, 369 (Iowa Ct. App. 2002). We conclude Naomi proved her entitlement to a modification of the physical care provision of the dissolution decree and we affirm the order of the district court. Both parties seek an award of appellate attorney fees. Because Naomi s income is not significantly lower than Sean s, we conclude each party shall bear his or her own fees. Costs of appeal are assessed to Sean. AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
