STEVEN C. LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF AMES, IOWA and CITY OF AMES, IOWA, Defendants-Appellants.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 9-094 / 08-0596
Filed May 6, 2009
STEVEN C. LEWIS,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF AMES, IOWA and CITY OF AMES, IOWA,
Defendants-Appellants.
________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Story County, Michael J. Moon,
Judge.
Appellant appeals a decision by the district court reversing the Civil
Service Commission. AFFIRMED.
Judith Parks, City of Ames Legal Department, Ames, for appellant.
Jay Smith, Sioux City, for appellee.
Considered by Vogel, P.J., and Vaitheswaran and Eisenhauer, JJ.
2
VOGEL, P.J.
The City of Ames appeals the district court ruling reversing the Civil
Service Commission’s decision, which upheld the termination of employee
Steven Lewis. His employment was terminated upon the temporary suspension
of his driver’s license, as driving was considered an essential part of his job. The
City asserts that the termination was not arbitrary, because it was consistent with
the employment policy.
Our review of the district court’s ruling is de novo,
although we do give weight to the trial court’s findings because of its opportunity
to have personally observed the witnesses. Mahaffey v. Civil Serv. Comm’n, 350
N.W.2d 184, 185 (Iowa 1984).
A civil service employee cannot be arbitrarily discharged for failure to meet
a civil service employer’s employment qualification or standard.
City of Des
Moines v. Civil Serv. Comm’n, 540 N.W.2d 52, 58 (Iowa 1995). With regard to
an agency action, the term “arbitrary” means that the action complained of was
without regard to established rules or standards. Mathis v. State Conservation
Comm’n, 369 N.W.2d 435, 437 (Iowa 1985).
The district court found that the City’s decision to terminate Lewis’s
employment was arbitrary, and reversed the decision of the Civil Service
Commission, reinstated Lewis’s job, and awarded him lost compensation. The
district court based this decision upon the temporary nature of Lewis’s driver’s
license suspension; the alternative jobs he could have performed for the City; the
3
work permit1 with ignition interlock system not being explored; and found the
punishment excessive for his eighteen years of service.
Upon our de novo
review, we find the district court set forth a thorough recitation of the appropriate
facts and reached a well reasoned legal conclusion that the City acted arbitrarily.
We thus affirm pursuant to Iowa Court Rule 21.29 (1)(a),(d), and (e).
AFFIRMED.
1
Although the City claims this was first presented by Lewis before the district court, the
court found the City, “failed to offer Lewis this accommodation.” Since the burden is on
the City to demonstrate its decision to terminate was not arbitrary, we agree with the
district court’s finding.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
