SOULTS FARMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. CHARLES J. SCHAFER, Defendant-Appellee. No. 8-905 / 08-1590 CHARLES J. SCHAFER, Counterclaim Plaintiff/ Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. SOULTS FARMS, INC., Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, and MARION ROBERT SOULTS and DONALD J. SOULTS, Third-Party Defendants. No. 8-1065 / 08-1778 MAURENE KLEVEN, Third-Party Plaintiff, vs. MARION ROBERT SOULTS, Third-Party Defendants. 2
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 8-228 / 07-0744
Filed April 22, 2009
SOULTS FARMS, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
CHARLES J. SCHAFER,
Defendant-Appellee.
____________________________________
No. 8-905 / 08-1590
CHARLES J. SCHAFER,
Counterclaim Plaintiff/
Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
SOULTS FARMS, INC.,
Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,
and
MARION ROBERT SOULTS and
DONALD J. SOULTS,
Third-Party Defendants.
____________________________________
No. 8-1065 / 08-1778
MAURENE KLEVEN,
Third-Party Plaintiff,
vs.
MARION ROBERT SOULTS,
Third-Party Defendants.
________________________________________________________________
2
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Guthrie County, Gary G. Kimes
Judge.
Appellant appeals a district court ruling denying its petition to correct,
modify, or vacate the original ruling. AFFIRMED.
Wade Hauser, Des Moines, for appellant, Soults Farms.
Randy Hefner of Hefner & Bergkamp, P.C., Adel, and A. Eric Neu, Carroll,
for appellee, Charles Schafer.
Considered by Vogel, P.J., and Vaitheswaran and Eisenhauer, JJ.
3
VOGEL, P.J.
Soults Farms, Inc. appeals the district court’s September 15, 2008
decision denying its petition to correct, modify, or vacate the original ruling, as
well as the October 16, 2008 order approving attorney fees. We find nothing in
the record to undermine the court’s factual findings, credibility assessments or
application of the law in the September 15 ruling, nor an abuse of discretion in
the October 16 order. As such, we affirm both the decision and the order without
opinion, pursuant to Iowa Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.24(1) and (4). Schafer’s
request for attorney fees on appeal is denied.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
