SHERRY WILLIAMS, Applicant-Appellant, vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 7-285 / 06-1432
Filed June 27, 2007
SHERRY WILLIAMS,
Applicant-Appellant,
vs.
STATE OF IOWA,
Respondent-Appellee.
________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Gregory A. Hulse,
Judge.
Sherry Williams appeals the denial of her application for postconviction
relief. AFFIRMED.
Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, and James G. Tomka, Assistant
Appellate Defender, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, William Hill, Assistant Attorney
General, and John P. Sarcone, County Attorney, for appellee State.
Heard by Huitink, P.J., and Zimmer and Vaitheswaran, JJ.
2
VAITHESWARAN, J.
A jury found Sherry Williams guilty of first-degree robbery. Iowa Code
§§ 711.1 and 711.2 (1997). The district court sentenced Williams to twenty-five
years in prison.
Williams filed an application for postconviction relief requesting earned
time that she alleged was “being unlawfully withheld by the State of Iowa.” In a
joint stipulation of facts, the parties framed Williams’s contention as whether
“earned time that is applied to her tentative discharge date (15%) should also be
applied to reduce her minimum parole date (70%).” They agreed that the key
statutory provisions governing this question are Iowa Code sections 902.12 1 and
903A.2. 2
1
Iowa Code section 902.12 (2005) provides:
A person serving a sentence for conviction of the following felonies,
including a person serving a sentence for conviction of the following
felonies prior to July 1, 2003, shall be denied parole or work release
unless the person has served at least seven-tenths of the maximum term
of the person’s sentence:
***
5. Robbery in the first or second degree in violation of section 711.2 or
711.3.
A 2004 amendment authorizes retroactive application of this provision to those
sentenced prior to July 1, 2003, which includes Williams.
2
Iowa Code section 903A.2 (2005) provides:
1. Each inmate committed to the custody of the director of the
department of corrections is eligible to earn a reduction of sentence in the
manner provided in this section. For purposes of calculating the amount
of time by which an inmate’s sentence may be reduced, inmates shall be
grouped into the following two sentence categories:
***
b. Category “B” sentences are those sentences which are subject to a
maximum accumulation of earned time of fifteen percent of the total
sentence of confinement under section 902.12. An inmate of an
institution under the control of the department of corrections who is
serving a category “B” sentence is eligible for a reduction of sentence
3
The district court thoroughly examined both code provisions and concluded the
minimum sentence prescribed by section 902.12 could not be reduced by good
conduct time. The Court reasoned as follows:
Section 902.12 addresses minimum sentences and parole while
section 903A.2 addresses reduction of sentences and discharge
dates. Section 902.12 requires certain felons to serve 70% of the
maximum sentence before being eligible for parole. In turn, section
903A.2 allows for earned time for each day of good conduct.
Earned time normally only affects an inmate’s discharge date.
Section 903A.2(1)(a) allows one and two-tenths of a day of earned
time for each day of good conduct and sets no maximum
accumulation on earned time. Section 903A.2(1)(b) limits both the
rate of accumulation of earned time (to fifteen eighty-fifths per day
of good conduct) and the maximum accumulation (to 15% of the
total sentence) for persons convicted of the felonies listed in section
902.12. Thus, section 903A.2(1)(b) references section 902.12
solely for the purpose of specifying the crimes to which section
903A.2(1)(b) limitations on earned time apply.
When viewed in this light, each section has independent legal
significance and, taken together, the sections produce a
harmonious and consistent body of legislation. Section 902.12
requires persons guilty of certain felonies to serve 70% of their
maximum sentence before being eligible for parole. Section
903A.2(1)(a) allows all inmates to accumulate earned time for good
conduct. Section 903A.2(1)(b) limits the rate and maximum
accumulation of earned time for persons guilty of felonies
enumerated in section 902.12.
(footnote omitted; emphasis in original).
The district court also considered Iowa Code section 903A.5.
That
provision lists certain mandatory minimum sentences that may be reduced by
earned good time. 3 Section 902.12 is absent from this list. The court stated, “[i]f
equal to fifteen eighty-fifths of a day for each day of good conduct by the
inmate.
3
Iowa Code Section 903A.5 states in pertinent part: “Earned time accrued and not
forfeited shall apply to reduce a mandatory minimum sentence being served pursuant to
section 124.406, 124.413, 902.7, 902.8, 902.8A, or 902.11.”
4
the legislature intended section 903A.2 to reduce the mandatory minimums set
forth in section 902.12 it would have referenced section 902.12 in section
903A.5.”
The district court ruled that Williams was obligated to “serve a
mandatory minimum of 70% of her 25 year sentence before being eligible for
parole.” The court denied her application for postconviction relief and this appeal
followed.
We discern no error in the district court’s conclusion or analysis.
Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
