STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. PAUL RAY ANDERSON, JR., Defendant-Appellant.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 7-128 / 06-0048
Filed July 12, 2007
STATE OF IOWA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
PAUL RAY ANDERSON, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Wayne County, David L.
Christensen, Judge.
Paul Ray Anderson Jr. appeals the district court’s order for reimbursement
of the cost of his legal assistance. AFFIRMED.
Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, and Martha Lucey, Assistant
Appellate Defender, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Thomas Andrews, Assistant Attorney
General, Alan M. Wilson, County Attorney, for appellee.
Considered by Sackett, C.J., and Huitink and Mahan, JJ.
2
MAHAN, J.
Paul
Ray
Anderson,
Jr.
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
for
reimbursement of the cost of his legal assistance. He argues (1) Iowa Code
section 815.9 (2005) is unconstitutional and (2) he was denied effective
assistance of counsel at the reimbursement hearing. We affirm.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings
Anderson was charged on October 29, 2004, with operating while
intoxicated (OWI), first offense.
He filed a financial affidavit indicating he
received disability benefits of $735 per month. The district court determined he
was indigent and appointed the attorney Anderson requested to represent him.
The attorney was contracted with the state public defender to provide indigent
defense. 1 During the representation, the attorney filed motions to exceed the
attorney fee limitation of $600 set by the public defender. See Iowa Admin. Code
r. 493-12.6(1).
The jury found Anderson not guilty on October 31, 2005.
On
November 22, 2005, the court ordered Anderson to reimburse the State for the
total costs of his legal assistance pursuant to Iowa Code section 815.9. Defense
counsel filed a motion challenging the constitutionality of section 815.9. After
granting a hearing on the motion, the district court dismissed the constitutional
challenges and ordered a payment plan of thirty-five dollars per month.
Anderson appeals.
1
There is no state public defender’s office in Wayne County, where Anderson was tried.
3
II. Standard of Review
We review constitutional challenges to statutes de novo.
State v.
Hernandez-Lopez, 639 N.W.2d 226, 233 (Iowa 2002). Statutes are cloaked with
a presumption of constitutionality. Id. Anderson must prove section 815.9 is
unconstitutional beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. If it is possible to construe the
statute in more than one manner, we must adopt the construction that does not
violate the constitution. In re Detention of Selby, 710 N.W.2d 249, 250 (Iowa Ct.
App. 2005).
III. Merits
This is a similar case to State v. Dudley, No. 7-129 (Iowa Ct. App.
June 27, 2007). The issues here were fully discussed and decided in that case.
We find the reasoning in Dudley persuasive and the authority cited in the case
controlling. Therefore, we will not address the same issues here. We affirm the
judgment of the district court.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
