IN THE INTEREST OF E.J.C., Minor Child, R.C., Mother, Appellant .
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 7-120 / 07-0033
Filed March 14, 2007
IN THE INTEREST OF E.J.C.,
Minor Child,
R.C., Mother,
Appellant.
________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Jasper County, Thomas W. Mott,
District Associate Judge.
A mother appeals the termination of her parental rights. REVERSED AND
REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
Scott Bandstra of Bandstra Law Firm, P.C., Des Moines, for appellant
mother.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kathrine Miller-Todd, Assistant
Attorney General, Steve Johnson, County Attorney, and James Cleverley,
Assistant County Attorney, for appellee State.
Maria Ruhtenberg of Whitfield & Eddy, P.L.C., Des Moines, for minor
child.
Considered by Vogel, P.J., and Vaitheswaran and Eisenhauer, JJ.
2
VOGEL, P.J.
Rosa appeals the district court’s termination of her parental rights to her
son, Elijah. 1 Because Rosa requested, but was denied court-appointed counsel,
we reverse and remand for rehearing.
Background Facts and Proceedings. In June 2005, Rosa’s son Elijah,
then just two months old, was removed from Rosa’s care because of “threats by
the mother that she leave with the child, the lack of care for the child and physical
abuse to the child has occurred in the home.” Elijah was adjudicated a child in
need of assistance (CINA) in July under Iowa Code section 232.2(6)(n) (2005)
(parent’s mental capacity/condition or drug or alcohol abuse results in child not
receiving adequate care). Because of her indigency, Rosa was represented by
court-appointed legal counsel throughout the course of the CINA proceeding,
including the permanency hearing on July 21, 2006.
When the petition to
terminate her parental rights was filed on October 27, 2006, Rosa was without
counsel.
It appears that Rosa did receive notice of the termination hearing,
which stated that an application for appointed counsel should be made
“immediately on a form available from the Clerk of Court or Juvenile Court
Officer.” Rosa waited and did not request court appointed counsel until the day
before the scheduled termination hearing of December 7, 2006. 2 The district
court took up the issue at the start of the hearing, acknowledged that it received
the request the previous day, but denied appointment of counsel stating,
1
The putative father’s parental rights were also terminated, but he does not appeal.
No application for court appointed counsel was made part of the record on appeal.
However a later application was filed on December 18 after the hearing, made
presumably for purposes of appointment of counsel on appeal.
2
3
It’s impractical to try to appoint an attorney on the evening before a
trial that’s going to start the day after, so it looks like you just waited
too long, [Rosa], to put in your application, so I can certainly take
that up, but it won’t delay the hearing.
The hearing proceeded without Rosa having the benefit of legal representation,
and the district court issued its order on December 27, terminating her parental
rights.
Scope of Review. We review termination of parental rights cases de
novo. In re J.E., 723 N.W.2d 793, 798 (Iowa 2006).
Right to Appointed Legal Counsel. Under the Federal Constitution, the
United States Supreme Court has held that there is no due process requirement
that indigent parents be provided with appointed counsel in every termination
proceeding. See Lassiter v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 452 U.S. 18, 31, 101 S. Ct.
2153, 262, 68 L. Ed. 2d 640 652, (1981), reh'g denied, 453 U.S. 927, 102 S. Ct.
889, 69 L. Ed. 2d 1023 (1981). Instead, the Court opined that courts should
examine the circumstances of each case individually, as states may find such
guarantees under their constitutions or state legislatures may have also created
statutory rights in various instances. Id., 452 U.S. at 31-34, 102 S. Ct. at 216263, 69 L. Ed. 2d at 652-654, 657. Our Iowa legislature has created such a
statutory right in section 232.113(1) (2005) which states:
Upon the filing of a petition the parent identified in the petition shall
have the right to counsel in connection with all subsequent
hearings and proceedings. If the parent desires but is financially
unable to employ counsel, the court shall appoint counsel. 3
3
Our supreme court has recently reiterated an indigent parent’s right to appointed
counsel in involuntary termination proceedings, by providing the same right to private,
involuntary termination of parental rights under chapter 600A. See In re R.S.N., 706
N.W.2d 705, 707-09 (Iowa 2005).
4
Therefore, involuntary termination proceedings conducted pursuant to Iowa Code
chapter 232 “call for the furnishing of an attorney at public expense when
requested by indigent parties.” In re S.A.J.B., 679 N.W.2d 645, 647 (Iowa 2004)
(citing In re J.L.L., 414 N.W.2d 133, 134 (Iowa 1987); Iowa Code § 232.113(1)).
In denying Rosa court appointed counsel, the district court reasoned that
her request, coming on the eve of trial, was simply made too late for the hearing
to proceed as scheduled.
While late filed requests can certainly hinder the
efficiency of a busy court docket, we find it notable that section 232.113(1) does
not set forth any time frame in which a request for court appointed counsel must
be made. Therefore, while Rosa should have been more attentive to her legal
needs and applied for counsel earlier, we cannot say that her delay necessarily
should deprive her of counsel. Absent a statutory limitation, we conclude the
district court erred when it declined Rosa’s request for court-appointed legal
counsel. 4
Moreover, the record reflects that Rosa’s borderline intellectual functioning
may have impeded her understanding of the proceedings against her and her
pressing need for counsel.
The Iowa Department of Human Services case
worker assigned to Rosa and Elijah testified at termination that Rosa believed
her rights had already been terminated at the July 2006 permanency hearing.
4
Other states have reached the conclusion that delay in requesting appointment of
counsel amounts to a waiver of that right. See generally Patricia C. Kussmann,
Annotation, Right of Indigent Parent to Appointed Counsel in Proceeding for Involuntary
Termination of Parental Rights, 92 A.L.R.5th 379 (2001) (analyzing the existence of the
right to counsel across various state jurisdictions); In re B.M.P., 704 S.W.2d 237 (Mo. Ct.
App. S.D. 1986) (holding a request on the day of the termination hearing came too late
to trigger the statutory guarantee of appointed counsel when father had no mental
deficiency or other incapacity that would prevent him from understanding the summons).
5
Under the circumstances of this case, 5 we conclude it was error for the district
court to determine that Rosa’s late request should deprive her of her right to
appointed counsel. We reverse the termination of Rosa’s parental rights to Elijah
and remand to the district court for rehearing with direction to appoint legal
counsel to represent Rosa prior to the proceeding.
REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
5
We also conclude that our case is distinguishable from In re S.R., 548 N.W.2d 176,
180 (Iowa Ct. App. 1996), where the district court denied appointment of counsel to a
father whose request came after termination had already occurred. The court reasoned
that the incarcerated father waived his right to court-appointed counsel due to his
inaction following the notification of his rights in the personal service that stated, “If you
are financially unable to hire an attorney, the Court will appoint one for you, if you notify
the Clerk of Juvenile Court of this fact within five days after you receive this Notice. If
you do not employ an attorney or notify the Clerk within the specified time that you wish
an attorney, you will be deemed to have waived this right.” Id. at 177.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.