Sierra Club v. Department of Health

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-21-0000673 30-MAR-2022 09:55 AM Dkt. 33 OAWST NO. CAAP-21-0000673 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I SIERRA CLUB, Plaintiff-Appellee v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and DR. ELIZABETH A. CHAR, in her official capacity as Director of Health, Defendants-Appellants APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 1CCV-20-0000751) ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS APPEAL Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and McCullen, JJ.) Upon consideration of the March 23, 2022 "Proposed Stipulation for Dismissal of Appeal" (Stipulation) filed by Defendants-Appellants Department of Health and Dr. Elizabeth A. Char, in her official capacity as Director of Health (Appellants), the papers in support, and the record, it appears that (1) the appeal has been docketed; (2) pursuant to Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 42(b), the parties stipulate to dismiss the appeal with prejudice and bear their own attorneys' fees and costs except Appellants shall pay in total $1,194.76 to Plaintiff-Appellee Sierra Club (Appellee) for attorney's fees and general excise tax thereon within sixty (60) days from the date this court approves the Stipulation; and (3) the Stipulation is dated and signed by counsel for all parties appearing in the appeal. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation to dismiss the appeal is approved, and the appeal is dismissed with prejudice. The parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and (By: NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER costs except Appellants shall pay in total $1,194.76 to Appellee for attorney's fees and general excise tax thereon within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 30, 2022. /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Associate Judge /s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.