Williams v. Georgia
Annotate this CaseAppellant Brodrick Williams was convicted of malice murder, armed robbery, and a firearm offense in connection with the shooting death of Daniel McGee. Appellant appealed, arguing: (1) the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his convictions; and (2) he was deprived of his right to conflict-free counsel. After review, the Georgia Supreme Court concluded: (1) the evidence was legally sufficient to support Appellant’s murder and firearm convictions, but not his armed robbery conviction; and (2) Appellant had not shown his trial counsel had an actual conflict of interest that adversely affected counsel’s representation. The Court therefore affirmed in part and reversed in part, remanding the case for further proceedings.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.