Ross v. Georgia
Annotate this CaseAfter a joint trial, appellants Curtis Billings and Matthew Ross (also known as Matthew Wells) were convicted of murder and other crimes related to the shooting death of Joseph Gunn. Appellants contended that the evidence was insufficient to support their convictions. Upon review, the Supreme Court concluded that the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to authorize a rational jury to find appellants guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of all the crimes of which they were convicted and sentenced. The Court affirmed Billings' conviction and sentence, but vacated Ross's sentence and remanded his case for resentencing.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.