Bailey v. State
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed his convictions for malice murder, conspiracy to commit armed robbery, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime in connection with the fatal shooting of two victims. Defendant challenged the sufficiency of the evidence and the admission into evidence of certain testimony. The court held that the challenges were without merit where the evidence was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes for which he was convicted and where defendant failed to object to the admission of the evidence at issue. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.