Graham v. Graham
Annotate this CaseWife and husband were married in 1997 and wife filed a petition for divorce in 2010. At issue was whether the marital residence was subject to equitable division. The trial court found that the marital residence was wife's separate property and awarded her sole possession. Husband applied for discretionary appeal and the court granted the application pursuant to the Court's Rule 34(4). The court, however, rejected husband's contention that the trial court committed reversible error when it failed to enter a consolidated pretrial order in violation of OCGA 9-11-16 and a scheduling order. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.