Giles, et al. v. Swimmer, et al.
Annotate this CaseThis case involved an underlying action for quiet title and came to the court from the trial court's grant of appellee BB&T's motion for summary judgment. The court could not sustain appellants' allegation that the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment to BB&T because genuine issues of material fact remained. The court also held that the trial court did not err when it granted BB&T's motion for summary judgment when appellants failed to show specific damages to support their claim of slander of title. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.