Thomas v. State
Annotate this CaseDefendant was convicted of murder and numerous other crimes in connection with a home invasion in 2004. On appeal, he challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to support four of his five kidnapping convictions and argued that two of his aggravated assault convictions should have been merged. The court held that the evidence was sufficient to authorize a rational jury to find defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of every one of the crimes for which he was convicted. The court found his remaining contentions to be meritless, except that one of his aggravated assault convictions did merge and so must be vacated.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.