Rogers v. State
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed his convictions for felony murder, aggravated assault, and burglary. The court held that the trial court's finding that the statements defendant made to an officer were freely and voluntarily made was not clearly erroneous; the trial court did not err in determining that the telephone recording at issue to an attorney was admissible; any error in allowing a certain statement to be read did not contribute to the verdict and was therefore harmless; and the evidence was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes of which he was convicted. Accordingly, the judgment was affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.