THE STATE v. DAVID LEE GILMORE
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
SECOND DIVISION MILLER, P. J., MERCIER, J., and PHIPPS, SENIOR APPELLATE JUDGE NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS COURT. ALL FILINGS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN THE TIMES SET BY OUR COURT RULES. January 27, 2022 In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A20A0189. THE STATE v. GILMORE. MERCIER, Judge. In State v. Gilmore, 355 Ga. App. 536 (844 SE2d 877) (2020), this Court affirmed the trial court’s denial of the State’s motions to admit a video recording of a controlled drug buy. In State v. Gilmore, 312 Ga. 289 (862 SE2d 499) (2021), the Georgia Supreme Court reversed our decision, holding that the admission of the video recording was not barred by the Confrontation Clause, and it remanded this case for further proceedings. We therefore vacate our earlier opinion, adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court as our own, and reverse the trial court’s judgment. Judgment reversed. Miller, P. J., and Senior Appellate Judge Herbert E. Phipps concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
