GEORGIA RIVER NETWORK ET AL. v. GRADY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

WHOLE COURT NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules February 23, 2016 In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A14A0215. GEORGIA RIVER NETWORK et al. v. TURNER et al. A14A0272. GEORGIA RIVER NETWORK et al. v. GRADY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al. A14A0273. TURNER v. GRADY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al. A14A0274. GRADY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al. v. GEORGIA RIVER NETWORK et al. MCFADDEN, Judge. In Turner v. Georgia River Network, 297 Ga. 306 (773 SE2d 706) (2015), our Supreme Court reversed Division 3 of our decision in Georgia River Network v. Turner, 328 Ga. App. 381 (762 SE2d 123) (2014), in which we held that the 25-foot buffer requirement of OCGA § 12-7-6 (b) (15) (A) applies to all state waters. Id. at 390-392 (3). In reversing, the Supreme Court concluded that, “OCGA § 12-7-6 (b) (15) (A) simply does not provide for the establishment of a buffer for state waters that are adjacent to banks without wrested vegetation.” 297 Ga. at 309 (footnote omitted). Accordingly, we vacate Division 3 of our opinion and adopt the judgment of the Supreme Court as our own. Divisions 1 and 2 of our opinion were not affected by the Supreme Court’s decision and thus remain in effect. See Shadix v. Carroll County, 274 Ga. 560, 563-564 (1) (554 SE2d 465) (2001). Judgments affirmed in part and reversed in part. Doyle, C. J., Andrews, P. J., Barnes, P. J., Ray, Boggs and Branch, JJ. concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.