Hill v. Cockrell

Annotate this Case

141 Ga. App. 39 (1977)

232 S.E.2d 384

HILL v. COCKRELL.

53309.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Submitted January 7, 1977.

Decided January 14, 1977.

Wendell C. Lindsey, for appellant.

Dock H. Davis, for appellee.

WEBB, Judge.

"[W]here the trial judge, sitting as the trior of the facts, hears the evidence, his findings based upon conflicting evidence is analogous to the verdict of a jury and should not be disturbed by a reviewing court if there is any evidence to support it." West v. West, 228 Ga. 397, 398 (185 SE2d 763) (1971); Lester Colodny Const. Co. v. Allen, 129 Ga. App. 545 (199 SE2d 917) (1973). Here there was ample legal evidence to support the findings of fact, and there is no error in the trial judge's conclusions of law.[1]

Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Marshall, J., concur.

NOTES

[1] For prior appearance see Hill v. Cockrell, 139 Ga. App. 616 (229 SE2d 105) (1976).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.