Parrish v. State

Annotate this Case

125 Ga. App. 97 (1971)

186 S.E.2d 541

PARRISH v. THE STATE.

46685.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Submitted November 2, 1971.

Decided November 22, 1971.

D. L. Lomenick, Jr., for appellant.

Earl B. Self, District Attorney, Ralph Hill, Jr., for appellee.

QUILLIAN, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of burglary. He filed an appeal and the case is here for review. Held:

*98 1. The appellant contends it was error to fail to grant his motion for a continuance on the ground of the absence of a material witness. The record shows: that the appellant was represented by counsel for several weeks prior to trial; that the appellant failed to inform his counsel that the presence of the witness was necessary and material to his defense; that no subpoena was issued for the witness by the appellant or his attorney. The denial of the motion for a continuance was not error. Code ยง 27-415; Coker v. State, 87 Ga. App. 411 (1) (74 SE2d 12).

2. The remaining enumerations of error are without merit.

Judgment affirmed. Jordan, P. J., and Evans, J., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.