Compton v. Weekes

Annotate this Case

107 Ga. App. 283 (1963)

129 S.E.2d 824

COMPTON v. WEEKES, Administrator.

39941.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided January 31, 1963.

Linus L. Zukas, for plaintiff in error.

Dennis, Bowden & Barton, Charles S. Barton, Weekes & Candler, John Wesley Weekes, contra.

HALL, Judge.

1. A suit against one described in the suit as "John Wesley Weekes, Administrator of the Estate of Robert F. Norton, Sr.," is a suit against John Wesley Weekes individually. Nolin v. Mooty, 29 Ga. App. 97 (1) (113 SE 814).

2. Assuming that the petition was amendable under Code ยง 81-1308, the record does not show any offer by the plaintiff to amend the petition prior to the judgment of the trial court sustaining the demurrer to the petition. In the absence of *284 such showing, it cannot be said that the trial judge erred in failing to give the plaintiff the opportunity to amend before sustaining the demurrer. Ripley v. Eady & Mayfield, 106 Ga. 422 (2) (32 SE 343).

Judgment affirmed. Carlisle, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.