VLADIMIR ROLANDO AVALOS, vs AMAURY DIAZ VELARDE,
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 23, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D22-399 Lower Tribunal No. 21-5946 ________________ Vladimir Rolando Avalos, Appellant, vs. Amaury Diaz Velarde, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mark Blumstein, Judge. Marrero, Chamizo, Marcer Law, LP, and David T. Valero, for appellant. Green, Matzner & Kellner, P.A., and Jay B. Green (Boca Raton); Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., and Elizabeth K. Russo, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and HENDON, and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Brookie v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 213 So. 3d 1129, 1131-32 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) ("Appellee[ ] did not violate any legal duty to Appellant, who observed the condition but was injured by failing to use due care for his own safety . . . . Appellee[ ] owed no duty to warn Appellant of the open and obvious condition, because Appellees' knowledge of the condition was not ‘superior’ to Appellant's."). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
