YVETTE LYNN HERNANDEZ, etc., vs MARK A. ZUCKER,

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 11, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D20-1397 Lower Tribunal No. 18-21195 ________________ Yvette Lynn Hernandez, etc., Appellant, vs. Mark A. Zucker, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Maria Elena Verde, Judge. Lorenzen Law P.A., and Dirk Lorenzen, for appellant. Marro Law P.A., and Meaghan K. Marro (Plantation), for appellee. Before EMAS, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197, 1203 (Fla. 1980) (noting: “In reviewing a true discretionary act, the appellate court must fully recognize the superior vantage point of the trial judge and should apply the ‘reasonableness’ test to determine whether the trial judge abused [its] discretion. If reasonable [people] could differ as to the propriety of the action taken by the trial court, then the action is not unreasonable and there can be no finding of an abuse of discretion. The discretionary ruling of the trial judge should be disturbed only when [the] decision fails to satisfy this test of reasonableness.”); Castillo v. Castillo, 59 So. 3d 221 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Pierre v. Pierre, 185 So. 3d 1264 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.