ANTONIO HODGSON vs THE STATE OF FLORIDA

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 20, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D19-2178 Lower Tribunal No. F14-3553A ________________ Antonio Hodgson, Appellant, vs. The State of Florida, Appellee. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Diane V. Ward, Judge. The Law Office of Robert David Malove, P.A., and Robert David Malove (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kseniya Smychkouskaya, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before LOGUE, LINDSEY and HENDON, JJ. PER CURIAM. Antonio Hodgson appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 alleging numerous claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Because we find that Hodgson’s claims were either conclusively refuted by the record, presented meritless issues, or were previously adjudicated on direct appeal, we affirm the trial court’s well-reasoned order. See McLin v. State, 827 So. 2d 948, 954 (Fla. 2002) (“To uphold the trial court’s summary denial of claims raised in a 3.850 motion, the claims must be either facially invalid or conclusively refuted by the record.”); Lukehart v. State, 70 So. 3d 503, 512 (Fla. 2011) (“[C]ounsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to make a meritless argument.” quoting Schoenwetter v. State, 46 So. 3d 535, 546 (Fla. 2010)). We further affirm Hodgson’s resentencing. Any comments by the trial court regarding the factors for sentencing a juvenile offender to a life sentence were harmless because Hodgson was neither sentenced to life imprisonment nor a term of years equal to life imprisonment. § 921.1401(2), Fla. Stat. (2019) (enumerating factors for “determining whether life imprisonment or a term of years equal to life imprisonment is an appropriate sentence” in a case involving a juvenile offender). Affirmed. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.