PHYLLIS OLIVE vs CLIFF GLANSEN

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 31, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D19-1175 Lower Tribunal Nos. 17-0296 & 13-23627 ________________ Phyllis Olive, Petitioner, vs. Cliff Glansen, Respondent. A Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Appellate Division, Victoria del Pino, Nushin Sayfie and Milton Hirsch, Judges. Nancy C. Wear, for petitioner. Law Offices of Hagen & Hagen, P.A., and Kevin L. Hagen (Ft. Lauderdale), for respondent. Before SALTER, LOGUE, and LINDSEY, JJ. PER CURIAM. Following our review of the record,1 we grant the petition and quash the order of the circuit appellate panel dated May 9, 2019, which awarded entitlement to appellate attorney’s fees in favor of Respondent Cliff Glansen. See Paul v. Avrahami, 265 So. 3d 634 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019); Jarrette Bay Inv. Corp. v. BankUnited, N.A., 207 So. 3d 345 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); Ramirez v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 67 So. 3d 1174 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). 1 By order entered June 18, 2019, this Court ordered Respondent Cliff Glansen to respond to the instant petition. He failed to do so. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.