EADY V. STATE

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 23, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D18-2013 Lower Tribunal Nos. 07-8133, 12-21671 ________________ Tauron Eady, Appellant, vs. The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Veronica A. Diaz, Judge. Tauron Eady, in proper person. Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before EMAS, C.J., and SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Cox v. State, 221 So. 3d 723, 725 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (holding: “Unlike a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850, a motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to rule 3.800(a) places the burden upon the defendant . . . to affirmatively identify court records which, on their face, demonstrate the existence of an illegal sentence or an entitlement to relief under rule 3.800(a)”); Llerana v. State, 953 So. 2d 31, 33 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (noting: “Concurrent sentences do not necessarily begin at the same time, and unless they are ordered to be coterminous, they will expire on different dates”); Knight v. State, 832 So. 2d 172, 172 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (affirming order denying motion for postconviction relief where the “plea colloquy contain[ed] no indication that the sentence was to be coterminous with any other sentence”). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.