CHARRY V. IN RE: TORRES V. GONZALEZ
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 23, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D18-1014 Lower Tribunal No. 17-9898 ________________ Anna M. Charry, Appellant, vs. In Re: Mariana Torres v. Alexis Gonzalez, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mavel Ruiz, Judge. Todd Ostegard, for appellant. Kula & Associates, P.A., and Elliot B. Kula and Ashley P. Singrossi, for appellee Mariana Torres. Before LOGUE and SCALES, JJ., and LUCK, Associate Judge. LOGUE, J. Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s order denying her motion to intervene following a hearing. We review the denial of the motion to intervene for an abuse of discretion. See Abujasen v. Dreke, 118 So. 3d 235, 235 n.1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (citing Barnhill v. Fla. Microsoft Anti-Trust Litig., 905 So. 2d 195, 199 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (“The standard of review of an order on a motion to intervene is abuse of discretion.”)). Although a hearing was held on Appellant’s motion, there is no transcript of the hearing. Under the circumstances of this case, in the absence of a transcript, we cannot reasonably conclude that the trial court abused its discretion, and therefore, we affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979); Shojaie v. Gables Court Prof’l Ctr., Inc., 974 So. 2d 1140, 1141-42 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). Affirmed. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
