SMITH V. STATE
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 23, 2019. ________________ No. 3D18-0991 Lower Tribunal No. 17-16780 ________________ Joseph Smith, Appellant, vs. The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Nushin G. Sayfie, Judge. Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Shannon Hemmendinger, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, and Gabrielle Raemy CharestTurken, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before EMAS, C.J., and HENDON, J., and LAGOA, Associate Judge. ON CONFESSION OF ERROR LAGOA, Associate Judge. Joseph Smith (“Smith”) appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of a controlled substance, possession of drug paraphernalia, and resisting an officer without violence, arguing that his trial was fundamentally flawed due to the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury as to reasonable doubt. As the State correctly concedes, the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury as to Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Criminal) 3.7 Plea of Not Guilty; Reasonable Doubt, and Burden of Proof, or any similar instruction, constituted fundamental error. See Cavagnaro v. State, 117 So. 3d 1111, 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (finding fundamental error where the jury charge did not include Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Criminal) 3.7 or any similar instruction); see also Curry v. State, 169 So. 3d 1258, 1258 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015); Burnette v. State, 103 So. 3d 1059 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). Accordingly, we reverse Smith’s conviction and remand for a new trial. Reversed and remanded. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
