MALZONE, ET AL. V. URIBE, ET AL.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 1, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D16-2608 Lower Tribunal No. 16-2857 ________________ Alberto Dalva Malzone, et al., Appellants, vs. Andres Uribe, et al., Appellees. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jorge E. Cueto, Judge. Law Offices of David S. Harris, and David S. Harris; Jennifer A. Kerr, P.A., and Jennifer A. Kerr, for appellants. Ronald I. Strauss, P.A., and Ronald I. Strauss, for appellees. Before LAGOA, EMAS and SCALES, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Williams v. Miami-Dade Cty. Public Health Tr., 17 So. 3d 859, 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (holding the trial court did not abuse its discretion when its sanctions order was well-supported by the evidence); P.B. v. Dep’t of Chidren & Family Servs., 709 So. 2d 590, 591 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (“We do not consider the question of adequate notice because Appellants did not object to the lack of notice in the proceedings below or request a continuance. The first time they raised the issue was on appeal. By failing to object and by proceeding on the matter at the hearing, Appellants waived their objections to the lack of notice.). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.