ZAMORA AND FUENTES V. TOWER HILL PRIME INS. CO.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 4, 2017. ________________ No. 3D16-1917 Lower Tribunal No. 15-14888 ________________ Martha Zamora and Odilio P. Fuentes, Appellants, vs. Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jorge E. Cueto, Judge. David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Perry & Neblett, P.A., and David A. Neblett and Jack Wynn, for appellants. Methe & Rockenbach, P.A., and Kara Berard Rockenbach (West Palm Beach), for appellee. Before LOGUE, LUCK and LINDSEY, JJ. ON CONFESSION OF ERROR PER CURIAM. Martha Zamora and Odilio P. Fuentes, the plaintiffs below, appeal an order granting final summary judgment in favor of their insurer, Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company. Upon Tower Hill’s commendable confession of error, and because genuine issues of material fact exist as to the amount of the actual cash value of the insured loss at hand, we reverse the final summary judgment and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings. See § 627.7011(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016); Siegel v. Tower Hill Signature Ins. Co., 3D16-1861, at *10-11 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 30, 2017); Francis v. Tower Hill Prime Ins. Co., 42 Fla. L. Weekly D1565 (Fla. 3d DCA July 12, 2017). Reversed and remanded. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
