RODRIGUEZ V. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION, ET AL.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 13, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D16-1126 Lower Tribunal No. 12-915-P ________________ Alejandro and Elizabeth Rodriguez, Appellants, vs. Florida Department of Transportation, et al., Appellees. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Luis M. Garcia, Judge. Schlesinger Law Offices, P.A., and Gregg A. Schlesinger and Zane Berg (Fort Lauderdale); Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., and Bard D. Rockenbach, Nichole J. Segal and Adam Richardson (West Palm Beach), for appellants. James M. Fishman, for appellee Florida Department of Transportation; Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke, Piper & Hochman, P.A., and E. Bruce Johnson, and Scott D. Alexander (Fort Lauderdale) for appellee Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority; Greenberg Traurig, P.A., and Michael G. Murphy (Orlando); Brigid F. Cech Samole, Timothy A. Kolaya, and Jay A. Yagoda, for appellees HDR Engineering, Inc., HDR Construction Control Corporation, HDR Engineering, Inc., HDR Constructors, Inc., HDR Environmental, Operations and Construction, Inc., and HDR Acquisition Services, Inc; Cole, Scott, & Kissane, P.A., and Scott A. Cole, David Salazar, and Daniel M. Schwarz, for appellee Garney Companies, Inc. DeMahy Labrador Drake Victor Rojas & Cabeza, and Kenneth R. Drake, Gregory A. Victor, Tiya S. Rolle, Scott A. Markowitz, William C. McCue, and Doron Weiss, for appellee Transfield Services Infrastructure, Inc. a/k/a VMS, Inc. Before SALTER, EMAS, and LOGUE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.