AZCO REALTY V. THE VILLAGE

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 19, 2014. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D14-984 Consolidated: 3D14-0005 Lower Tribunal No. 12-24520 ________________ Azco Realty, Inc., Appellant, vs. The Village at Culfstream Park, etc., et al., Appellees. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose M. Rodriguez, Judge. Katz, Barron, Squitero, Faust, Friedberg, English & Allen and Jon W. Zeder, for appellant. Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford and Shelley H. Leinicke and Jonathan S. Miller (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellees. Before SHEPHERD, C.J., and EMAS and SCALES, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Geneva Inv., Ltd. v. Trafalgar Developers, Ltd., 274 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Bradley v. Banks, 260 So. 2d 256, 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972) (“The appellee was entitled to summary judgment on plaintiffs’ claim for a portion of a real estate commission because there was no genuine issue of material fact concerning the proposition that [plaintiff-appellant] was not registered as a real estate broker or salesman at the time the act or service was performed.”). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.