BAKER V. STATE
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2012 Opinion filed November 7, 2012. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D12-2570 Lower Tribunal No. 07-7524-B ________________ Raymond Baker, Appellant, vs. The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Rosa Rodriguez and Dava J. Tunis, Judges. Raymond Baker, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee. Before SALTER and EMAS, JJ., SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM. Raymond Baker appeals an order summarily denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). After Baker filed his notice of appeal, the trial court entered an order denying a motion for rehearing or reconsideration. We affirm, without comment, the trial court s denial of Baker s Rule 3.800 motion. However, we note that Baker s motion for rehearing and the trial court s denial of that motion are nullities. The order denying the motion for rehearing was entered without jurisdiction as Baker abandoned his motion when he filed the notice of appeal. See, e.g., Southers v. State, 961 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); see also In re: Forfeiture of $104,591 in U.S. Currency, 589 So. 2d 283 (Fla. 1991); Loeb v. State, 387 So. 2d 433, 435 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (recognizing that it is well established that the filing of a notice of appeal vests the appellate court with complete and exclusive jurisdiction). Affirmed. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
