ROLACK V. STATE
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2012Opinion filed October 3, 2012. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D12-2094 Lower Tribunal No. 95-201A, 91-30804B ________________ D Andre Rolack, Appellant, vs. The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Stacy D. Glick, Judge. D'Andre Rolack, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee. Before WELLS, C.J., and SHEPHERD and SALTER, JJ. PER CURIAM. This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). On appeal from a summary denial, this court must reverse unless the postconviction record, see Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D). Defendant raises four claims in his 3.800 motion, which the trial court summarily denied as successive. Because the record now before us fails to show that defendant raised the exact claims in prior postconviction motions, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings, or for attachment of record proof of the successive nature of Defendant s motion. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
