ZULON V. PECKINS

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2012 Opinion filed February 08, 2012. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D11-1511 Lower Tribunal No. 08-3027 ________________ Elizabeth Zulon, Appellant, vs. David Peckins, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lawrence A. Schwartz, Judge. Todd R. Schwartz, for appellant. Hugo L. Black, Jr., and Bonnie J. Losak-Jimenez, for appellee. Before SUAREZ, ROTHENBERG, and LAGOA, JJ. ROTHENBERG, J. The appellant, Elizabeth Zulon, appeals from an order of the probate court removing her as co-personal representative of her father s estate. Because removal was ordered without notice or an evidentiary hearing, the ruling did not meet even the most rudimentary requirements of due process. LoCascio v. Estate of LoCascio, 36 Fla. L. Weekly D1391, D1392 (Fla. 3d DCA June 29, 2011). We reverse and remand with instructions to reinstate the co-personal representatives;1 discharge Mr. Peckins as successor personal representative and reinstate him as guardian ad litem; and conduct a duly noticed evidentiary hearing regarding the removal of Elizabeth Zulon and Ana Zulon as co-personal representatives. 2 1 The probate court is of course free to appoint an administrator ad litem to assist in the administration of the estate until the motions for removal of the co-personal representatives have been resolved and if the prerequisites of Florida Probate Rule 5.120 are satisfied. 2 We note that Ana Zulon did not object to her removal and she did not appeal the probate order removing her. However, because Ana Zulon s consent to her removal was clearly based on the probate court s expressed intent to replace both sisters with Mr. Peckins, and we have reversed that ruling, we restore Ana Zulon to her original position as co-personal representative to allow her to make an informed decision going forward. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.