CURRY V. STATE
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2009 Opinion filed October 14, 2009. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D08-2345 Lower Tribunal No. 07-40854 ________________ Walter Curry, Appellant, vs. The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, John Schlesinger, Judge. Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Harvey J. Sepler, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Nicholas Merlin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before COPE and GERSTEN, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Baugh v. State, 961 So. 2d 198, 204 (Fla. 2007) ( There is sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction if, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, a rational trier of fact could find the existence of the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. ); T.H. v. State, 899 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (holding that sufficient evidence established that automobile recovered was same automobile stolen from victim). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
