CROSS V. BRAMAN
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2007 Opinion filed December 19, 2007. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D07-1334 Lower Tribunal No. 06-25075 ________________ Angelo Cross, Appellant, vs. Braman Motors, Inc., Appellee. A non-final appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Maria Espinosa Dennis, Judge. Stabinski & Funt; Lawrence & Daniel and Adam Lawrence, for appellant. Richard A. Sherman Sr.; Bohdan Neswiacheny, for appellee. Before COPE, WELLS and SALTER, JJ. WELLS, Judge. Angelo Cross appeals from an order submitting to arbitration his malicious prosecution action against his employer, Braman Motors, Inc. We reverse. While the parties contract mandates arbitration for virtually all claims, 1 it expressly excludes those brought under the workers compensation laws. Since the instant claim for malicious prosecution stems directly from Braman s actions during the workers compensation case, it is not arbitrable under the parties agreement. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings. 1 A sample of the employment-related claims listed as subject to arbitration include those under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Equal Pay Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Family Medical Leave Act, the Older Worker s Benefits Protection Act, as well as all other federal, state and local employment-related laws, regulations, rules or theories. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
