SAUER V. SAUER

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM, A.D. 2006 DETLEF SAUER, ** Appellant, ** vs. ** YOLANDA SAUER, CASE NO. 3D04-2550 ** Appellee. ** LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 03-2829 Opinion filed December 13, 2006. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Judith L. Kreeger, Judge. Cain & Snihur and May L. Cain, for appellant. Contreras, Jonasz & Camacho and Jonathan Jonasz; Richard J. Preira, for appellee. Before FLETCHER, SHEPHERD, and SUAREZ, JJ. PER CURIAM. In this dissolution matter the former husband appeals the final judgment and raises numerous issues. We affirm in all respects, but remand for correction of a mathematical error in the final former judgment. husband s net On Page monthly 15 of the income, final after judgment, payment of the his alimony obligations, should be $5,356.74 instead of the $6,106 found by the court. The former wife acknowledges that the former husband s child support obligation, therefore, would be 64% or $1,642.24 rather than the 67% or $1,793.35 found by the court. We therefore remand the case for correction of these errors. Affirmed and remanded for corrections. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.