BURYN VS. STATE

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM, A.D. 2004 JOSE ENRIQUEZ, ** Appellant, ** vs. ** ** THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. CASE NO. 3D04-2023 LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 84-1073A ** Opinion filed September 9, 2004. An appeal under Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Henry Leyte-Vidal, Judge. Jose Enriquez, in proper person. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee. Before COPE, GERSTEN and GREEN, JJ. PER CURIAM. A life imprisonment sentence for is purposes not of impermissible Article I, Section indefinite 17 of the Florida Constitution. See Alvarez v. State, 358 So. 2d 10, 12 (Fla. 1978) ( We also reject petitioner s contention that the statute is unconstitutionally vague and indefinite. person can predict the maximum length of time Although no which can be served by a prisoner under a sentence of life, this in itself does not render a life sentence impermissibly indefinite. ) (footnote omitted); Lopez v. State, No. 3D04-1545 (Fla. 3d DCA August 11, 2004).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.