MOORE V. STATE

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JANUARY TERM A.D., 2004 ** JOE E. MOORE, ** Appellant, vs. ** CASE NO. 3D04-963 ** THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ** LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 97-16606 Appellee. ** Opinion filed June 9, 2004. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b) (2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Daryl E. Trawick, Judge. Joe E. Moore, in proper person. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee. Before COPE, FLETCHER and RAMIREZ, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. 2000) ( Prior Johnson v. State, 763 So. 2d 283, 284-85 (Fla. to the amendments produced by chapter 95-182, robbery was one of the qualifying offenses which allowed a trial court to Johnson violent felony See § 775.084(1)(b)1.c., Fla. Stat. (1993). offender. sentence Thus, would have a defendant qualified as as a a habitual habitual violent felony offender prior to the amendments reflected in chapter 95-182. . . . In sum, we find that Johnson was not affected by the passage of chapter 95-182. ). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.