ESMURDOC V. DAIMLER CHRYSLER

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM A.D., 2004 JOCELYN ESMURDOC, ** Appellant, ** vs. ** DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, et al., CASE NO. 3D04-874 ** ** Appellees. LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 03-10796 ** Opinion filed October 20, 2004. An Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Henry H. Harnage, Judge. Krohn & Moss and Jason H. Carls Weisberg; Scott Cohen, for appellant. (Sunrise); Alex D. Anderson St. Denis & Glenn and John Glenn and Edward J. Welch (Boca Raton), for appellees. Before GREEN, FLETCHER, and WELLS, JJ. PER CURIAM. As DaimlerChrysler Corporation is neither a party to the contract containing the arbitration clause nor a third-party beneficiary court s of order arbitration. the arbitration which stayed clause, the suit we and reverse the referred trial it to The case is remanded for proceedings consistent herewith. Reversed and remanded. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.